Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Benchmarks with Error Control and Automatic Parameterization

Results are presented for four optimization benchmark problems posed by the AIAA Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group. The benchmarks are intended to exercise optimization frameworks on representative airfoil and wing design problems. All problems involve drag minimization subject to geometric and aerodynamic constraints. Our design approach involves two forms of adaptation. First, the shape parameterization is gradually and automatically enriched from an initially coarse search space. Second, adjoint solutions are used to drive adaptive mesh refinement to control discretization error. The error threshold is tailored so that the finest meshes, with the greatest accuracy, are used only when nearing the optimum. On the inviscid airfoil design problem, while reducing the drag by a factor of 10, we show how the combination of progressive parameterization and tiered discretization error control can dramatically accelerate the optimization. On the viscous airfoil design problem, we use inviscid analysis-driven optimization to reduce the total drag by a factor of two. Next, we improve the span efficiency factor of a wing by performing twist optimization. Finally, we optimize the Common Research Model wing, managing to hold drag roughly fixed, while targeting an initially-violated pitching moment constraint. Our approach aims to introduce greater complexity and accuracy only when necessary to improve the design, and also support a greater degree of automation.

[1]  Jacques Peter,et al.  Gradient-Based Aerodynamic Optimization with the elsA Software , 2014 .

[2]  M. Berger,et al.  Progress Towards a Cartesian Cut-Cell Method for Viscous Compressible Flow , 2012 .

[3]  T. Pulliam,et al.  Adjoint Formulation for an Embedded-Boundary Cartesian Method , 2005 .

[4]  R. Duvigneau Adaptive Parameterization using Free-Form Deformation for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2005 .

[5]  Mathias Wintzer Span Efficiency Prediction Using Adjoint-Driven Mesh Refinement , 2010 .

[6]  O. Amoignon,et al.  Mesh Deformation using Radial Basis Functions for Gradient-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2007 .

[7]  Mathias Wintzer,et al.  Adjoint-Based Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Complex Geometries , 2008 .

[8]  Richard L. Campbell,et al.  Efficient Viscous Design of Realistic Aircraft Configurations , 1998 .

[9]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Toward Automatic Verification of Goal-Oriented Flow Simulations , 2014 .

[10]  C. Allen,et al.  Unified fluid–structure interpolation and mesh motion using radial basis functions , 2008 .

[11]  Nasa Output Error Estimates and Mesh Refinement in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2013 .

[12]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  RANS-based aerodynamic shape optimization investigations of the common research modelwing , 2014 .

[13]  Wataru Yamazaki,et al.  Geometry Parameterization and Computational Mesh Deformation by Physics-Based Direct Manipulation Approaches , 2010 .

[14]  Olivier Amoignon,et al.  Study of parameterizations in the project CEDESA , 2014 .

[15]  M. Nemec,et al.  Parallel Adjoint Framework for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Component-Based Geometry , 2011 .

[16]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Parametric Deformation of Discrete Geometry for Aerodynamic Shape Design , 2012 .

[17]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Application of Jetstream to a Suite of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Problems , 2014 .

[18]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  A Parallel Multilevel Method for Adaptively Refined Cartesian Grids with Embedded Boundaries , 2000 .

[19]  Daniel J Poole,et al.  Application of Control Point-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization to Two-Dimensional Drag Minimization , 2014 .

[20]  Marian Nemec,et al.  Integrated Nacelle-Wing Shape Optimization for an Ultra-High Bypass Fanjet Installation on a Single-Aisle Transport Configuration , 2013 .

[21]  M. Aftosmis Solution adaptive cartesian grid methods for aerodynamic flows with complex geometries , 1997 .

[22]  S. Nadarajah Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Optimization of Benchmark Problems , 2015 .

[23]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[24]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adaptive Shape Control for Aerodynamic Design , 2015 .

[25]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity computations for an embedded-boundary Cartesian mesh method , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[26]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Adjoint Error Estimation and Adaptive Refinement for Embedded-Boundary Cartesian Meshes , 2007 .

[27]  C. Allen,et al.  Domain-Element Method for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Applied to a Modern Transport Wing , 2009 .