On Making Sense of Odd Couples: Mood Effects on the Perception of Mismatched Relationships

Are our judgments of unusual, atypical couples more likely to be distorted due to temporary mood? Two experiments based on a recent multiprocess theory developed by Forgas predicted and found greater mood-consistent bias in judgments of atypical rather than typical relationships. In Experiment 1, happy and sad subjects judged couples who were well-matched or ill-matched in terms of physical attractiveness. In Experiment 2, a false-feedback mood induction was used, followed by judgments of typical and atypical couples. In both studies, mood effects on judgments were consistently greater for mismatched couples. The results are interpreted as suggesting the greater use of mood-based inferences in judgments of unusual targets that require more constructive processing. The role of typicality in mediating mood effects on judgments is discussed, and the implications of the findings for everyday judgments about relationships are considered.

[1]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Radiating beauty: Effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. , 1973 .

[2]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. , 1987 .

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  The Influence of Mood on Perceptions of Social Interactions , 1984 .

[4]  C. Gouaux,et al.  Interpersonal attraction as a function of affective state and affective change , 1973 .

[5]  C. Gouaux,et al.  Induced affective states and interpersonal attraction. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  J. Forgas The Effects of Prototypicality and Cultural Salience on Perceptions of People , 1983 .

[7]  N. Anderson Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Role of Physical Attractiveness in the Interpretation of Facial Expression Cues , 1987 .

[9]  W. Griffitt,et al.  Environmental effects on interpersonal affective behavior: ambient effective temperature and attraction. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  G. Bower Mood and memory. , 1981, The American psychologist.

[11]  G. Bower,et al.  Mood effects on person-perception judgments. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Polarized appraisals of out-group members. , 1980 .

[13]  S. Feshbach,et al.  The effects of fear arousal and suppression of fear upon social perception. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  J. Forgas,et al.  After the Movies , 1987 .

[15]  M. G. Efran,et al.  The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. , 1974 .

[16]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Self-Presentation in Job Interviews: When There Can Be “Too Much of a Good Thing”1 , 1986 .

[17]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[18]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  J. Forgas,et al.  Dimensions of romantic involvement: Towards a taxonomy of heterosexual relationships. , 1980 .

[20]  G. Bower,et al.  Praise or blame? Affective influences on attributions for achievement. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  P. Lewis,et al.  Beautiful is good: Evidence that the physically attractive are more socially skillful , 1977 .

[22]  J. Forgas,et al.  Affective influences on partner choice: role of mood in social decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.