Information Systems as Dialectic, Tool - Mediated Activity

Information Systems (IS) draws its significance from the uniqueness of computer-based information and communications tools and their place in shaping recent human history. Advances in the field come from a better understanding of how to develop and use these tools and what impact they have on the way we work, and live. As IS is still an evolving field of study, two views, the objective and the subjective, are in constant tension and, though these may be considered complementary, it is rare that they come together as a unified whole. A more balanced, and integrated, foundation for IS may be found in the subject-object dialectic arising out of the German philosophical tradition. An extension of this approach from the Cultural-Historical Activity Theory is presented in this paper. This theory views all human endeavour as a purposeful, dynamic, dialectic relationship between subject and object, mediated by tools, such as technology and information, and by the social environment or community. An adaptation of this holistic theory, to incorporate the best of other theoretical approaches used by IS researchers, could span and integrate the breadth of the field IS providing it with unity and identity.

[1]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Understanding organizational learning by focusing on “activity systems” , 2000 .

[2]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[3]  Yogesh Malhotra,et al.  Knowledge Management for E-Business Performance: Advancing Information Strategy to “Internet Time” , 2000 .

[4]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Organisational memory and learning network organisation: the case of Finnish labour protection inspectors , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Helen Hasan,et al.  The mediating role of technology in making sense of information in a knowledge‐intensive industry , 1999 .

[7]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[8]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[9]  Alan Fowler,et al.  The role of AI-based technology in support of the knowledge management value activity cycle , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[11]  F. Blackler KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[12]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Codifying or enabling: the challenge of knowledge management systems , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  John Ashford An information-space model for the development and application of computer-based tools in information creation and dissemination , 1997, J. Documentation.

[14]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[15]  V. Kaptelinin Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[16]  Helen Hasan,et al.  An activity-based model of collective knowledge , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[17]  Shoshana Zuboff In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[18]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Knowledge networking: a holistic solution for leveraging corporate knowledge , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  V. V. Davydov Perspectives on activity theory: The content and unsolved problems of activity theory , 1999 .