Compressive sensing analysis of Synthetic Aperture Radar raw data

This work addresses the use of compressive sensing to compress real Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) raw data. Due to the low computational resources of the acquisition platforms and the steadily increasing resolution of SAR systems, huge amounts of data are collected and stored, which cannot generally be processed on board and must be transmitted to the ground to be processed and archived. Although compressive sensing (CS) has been proposed and studied by a lot of researchers, almost none of them touches the real application of it. While, in this paper, we test the sparsity of the real SAR raw data (obtained by University of Kansas in Greenland, 2010), compress it using compressive sensing, and then recover the original signal using several CS recovery algorithms (Basis Pursuit, Matching Pursuit and Orthogonal Matching Pursuit), and compare these methods' performance. Simulation results are presented to prove the successful application of CS to real SAR raw data. When proper sparsity matrix is chosen, the real SAR data could be transformed to sparse signal. Using our designed algorithm, the positions and the exact values of the SAR raw data can be almost perfectly recovered with a very low MSE at a compression ratio of 1/8. This is of great significance to help us perform further research in the applications of CS to real SAR raw data.

[1]  Enrico Magli,et al.  Wavelet-based compression of SAR raw data , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[2]  Alberto Moreira,et al.  A comparison of several algorithms for SAR raw data compression , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Anthony Vetro,et al.  Low complexity efficient raw SAR data compression , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  John C. Curlander,et al.  Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing , 1991 .

[5]  Min Wang,et al.  Raw SAR data compression by structurally random matrix based compressive sampling , 2009, 2009 2nd Asian-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar.

[6]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Raw SAR data compression using vector quantization , 1995 .

[7]  John Paden,et al.  3D imaging of ice sheets , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[8]  Walter Geisselhardt,et al.  DIGITAL IMAGE WATERMARKING USING DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORM : PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF ERROR CORRECTION CODES , 2022 .

[9]  Shie Qian,et al.  Signal approximation via data-adaptive normalized Gaussian functions and its applications for speech processing , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[10]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  D. Donoho,et al.  Basis pursuit , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 28th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[12]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Block adaptive quantization of Magellan SAR data , 1989 .

[13]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  Vito Pascazio,et al.  SAR phase history data compression by using wavelet packets , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).

[15]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[16]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.