Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional radiography for the detection of vertebral fractures.

Prevalent vertebral fractures confer a high risk of subsequent fractures; therefore, fracture identification is a key issue in osteoporosis management. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry has become the most widespread technique for the assessment of bone density, and can also provide images for assessment of vertebral morphometry (MXA) that are undistorted by parallax. The radiation dose is very low compared with conventional radiography. Whether the resolution of MXA is adequate for vertebral morphometry is uncertain. The present study compares MXA with conventional radiography in detecting vertebral deformities. MXA scans and lateral radiographs were performed in 61 women with osteoporosis. Adequate images were obtained in 99.1% of the 793 vertebrae by radiography and 95.6% by MXA. Poor image quality was mostly at T4-6 by MXA. Precision of repeat analyses was comparable between the techniques. Heights measured by MXA were 24 to 35% less than the radiographic values, the methods produced equivalent results for the ratio of anterior to posterior heights, but the MXA values for middle to posterior ratios were about 10% lower than for the radiographs (p < 0.0001). The extent of agreement between the techniques in identifying vertebral fractures was dependent on the strictness of the fracture definition used. With a 3 standard deviation (SD) criterion, the techniques found similar numbers of patients to have vertebral deformities, and the concordance in classification of individual vertebrae was 94%. At a 2 SD, cut-off concordance was 79%, and at 4 SD, it was 96%. Receiver-operating characteristic curves using cut-offs of > or = 3 SDs also showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. We conclude that MXA shows acceptable performance for clinical use in diagnosing vertebral deformities, as long as cut-offs of > or = 3 SDs are used, although a few percent of vertebrae in the upper thoracic region cannot be imaged adequately using this technique.

[1]  G. Blake,et al.  Optimizing data acquisition and analysis of morphometric X-ray absorptiometry , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[2]  H. Kang,et al.  Vertebral Fracture in Osteoporosis , 1993 .

[3]  M. Dougados,et al.  Clinical evaluation of spine morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[4]  R. Ziegler,et al.  A newly developed spine deformity index (SDI) to quantitate vertebral crush fractures in patients with osteoporosis. , 1988, Bone and mineral.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  R. Epstein,et al.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  C. Wu,et al.  Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  G. M. Blake,et al.  Morphometric X-ray Absorptiometry and Morphometric Radiography of the Spine: A Comparison of Analysis Precision in Normal and Osteoporotic Subjects , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  Evaluation of Differences Between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam Densitometers , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[10]  M. Favus,et al.  Clinical utility of dual-energy vertebral assessment (DVA) , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  S. Cummings,et al.  A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  G. Blake,et al.  Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots , 1994, BMJ.

[14]  J. Li,et al.  Morphometric X‐Ray Absorptiometry and Morphometric Radiography of the Spine: A Comparison of Prevalent Vertebral Deformity Identification , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  R. Eastell,et al.  Identification of Vertebral Deformities in Women: Comparison of Radiological Assessment and Quantitative Morphometry Using Morphometric Radiography and Morphometric X‐Ray Absorptiometry , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[17]  S. H. Kan,et al.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  S. Cummings,et al.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis , 1996 .

[19]  R. Eastell,et al.  Classification of vertebral fractures , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture , 1991 .

[21]  G. M. Blake,et al.  Visual Assessment of Vertebral Deformity by X-ray Absorptiometry: A Highly Predictive Method to Exclude Vertebral Deformity , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  A. Silman,et al.  Definition and diagnosis of vertebral fracture. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[23]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[24]  G. Blake,et al.  Technical principles of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. , 1997, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[25]  S. Cummings,et al.  Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry of the spine: Correlation in vivo with morphometric radiography , 1994, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  G. Blake,et al.  Morphometric X‐Ray Absorptiometry: Reference Data for Vertebral Dimensions , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  J. Thorpe,et al.  Image Resolution of the Lunar Expert-XL , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[28]  J. Compston,et al.  Vertebral Morphometry: Repeat Scan Precision Using the Lunar Expert-XL and the Hologic 4500A. A Study for the “WISDOM” RCT of Hormone Replacement Therapy , 2000, Osteoporosis International.