Dynamic frictional constraints for robot assisted surgery

Collaborative, as opposed to autonomous, control strategies are used within the majority of commercially available, surgical robotic systems. Amongst these, active constraints and virtual fixtures, where assistance is in the form of regulation applied to the motion of surgical tools, offer an effective means to maximise both user and robot capabilities. Conventional active constraint approaches, however, are likely to result in active forcing of the tools when used within a dynamically changing surgical environment. It is posited that such behaviour inherently reduces a surgeon's control over the procedure, and therefore compromises patient safety and clinical acceptance. Utilising a friction model to enforce constraints ensures that energy is never introduced into the system; however frictional constraints suffer from problems once penetration of a constrained region has occurred. A frictional constraint formulation is proposed which eliminates this by redirecting a user's motion, guiding him towards the surface. Experimental validation shows that the proposed constraint significantly improves a user's path-following performance over unassisted cases, while approaching the performance benchmark of a viscoelastic active constraint.

[1]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Dynamic Active Constraints for Hyper-Redundant Flexible Robots , 2009, MICCAI.

[2]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A two-port framework for the design of unconditionally stable haptic interfaces , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[3]  P. Dahl A Solid Friction Model , 1968 .

[4]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Using Kinect and a Haptic Interface for Implementation of Real-Time Virtual Fixture , 2011 .

[5]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Spatial Motion Constraints for Robot Assisted Suturing Using Virtual Fixtures , 2005, MICCAI.

[6]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Design considerations and human-machine performance of moving virtual fixtures , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Vision-assisted control for manipulation using virtual fixtures , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[8]  Jing Ren,et al.  Dynamic 3-D Virtual Fixtures for Minimally Invasive Beating Heart Procedures , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Single state elastoplastic friction models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Kostas E. Bekris,et al.  Visual and force-feedback guidance for robot-assisted interventions in the beating heart with real-time MRI , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  A new model for control of systems with friction , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  M. S. Nathan,et al.  The Probot—an active robot for prostate resection , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  Hideo Fujimoto,et al.  A Control Framework to Generate Nonenergy-Storing Virtual Fixtures: Use of Simulated Plasticity , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Virtual Fixtures for Robotic Cardiac Surgery , 2001, MICCAI.

[15]  Louis B. Rosenberg,et al.  Virtual fixtures: Perceptual tools for telerobotic manipulation , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[16]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Discrete-Time Elasto-Plastic Friction Estimation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[17]  Brian L. Davies,et al.  The Acrobot system for total knee replacement , 2003, Ind. Robot.

[18]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Spatial Motion Constraints Using Virtual Fixtures Generated by Anatomy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[19]  Hiromi Mochiyama,et al.  Admittance and Impedance Representations of Friction Based on Implicit Euler Integration , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.