Modeling successional patterns of high-elevation forests under changing herbivore pressure – responses at the landscape level

Abstract We describe an ecological risk assessment for determining the potential long-term impacts of browsing by red deer, roe deer and chamois on the stand dynamics of mountain forests in xeric parts of Central Europe. The assessment is performed by applying a forest succession model of the FORET/JABOWA type which was supplemented with an empirically based browsing subroutine to simulate the effects of browsing by red and roe deer, and chamois. The following scenarios are assumed: (1) no browsing; (2) actual browsing intensity as determined in field trials; (3) browsing intensity twice as high as in scenario (2); and (4) browsing intensity three times as high as in scenario (2). The simulations for two different forest sites in the subalpine region of Eastern Switzerland revealed that heavy browsing can alter development and composition of the observed forests. The extent of this alteration was influenced not only by high browsing intensity, but also by the selection of tree species which were browsed on a particular site at the same time. Taking into account all the uncertainties of the model approach, we conclude from our preliminary studies that, in the regions considered, even strong herbivore pressure (2–3 times today's values) is not a major threat for the survival of the forest as a biological resource, i.e. the long-term total woody biomass is not altered significantly and the changes in the successional pathways are not dramatic. High browsing intensities, however, alter the forest structure considerably. We found that heavily browsed forests tend to be more open, mortality is higher and trees reach an intermediate and adult size quicker. This shortened development cycle of the stands may have implications for forest functions. The risk assessment yields critical values for mean browsing intensity, `MBI', ( Pinus cembra / Pinus mugo : 30%; Picea abies : 50%; and Larix decidua : 40%), below which successional patterns and forest structures with browsing are not significantly different from forest succession without browsing.

[1]  H. Bugmann A Simplified Forest Model to Study Species Composition Along Climate Gradients , 1996 .

[2]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[3]  A. Fischlin,et al.  Model convergence and state variable update in forest gap models , 1996 .

[4]  F. Kienast,et al.  Classifying the life-history strategies of trees on the basis of the Grimian model , 1994 .

[5]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest: Contents , 1992 .

[6]  F. Kienast,et al.  A simulated map of the potential natural forest vegetation of Switzerland , 1993 .

[7]  R. Naiman,et al.  Moose, Microbes, and the Boreal ForestThrough selective browsing, moose change plant communities and ecosystem properties , 1988 .

[8]  Ronald P. Neilson,et al.  A rule-based vegetation formation model for Canada , 1993 .

[9]  Q. Gao,et al.  A model of regional vegetation dynamics and its application to the study of Northeast China Transect (NECT) responses to global change , 1998 .

[10]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[11]  T. Carter,et al.  IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptations : part of the IPCC special report to the first session of the conference of the parties to the UN framework convention on climate change , 1994 .

[12]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  A SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODEL OF MOOSE FORAGINGAND ENERGETICS , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Modeling Large-Scale Vegetation Dynamics , 1993 .

[14]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Transient climate change and net ecosystem production of the terrestrial biosphere , 1998, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[16]  W. Post,et al.  Development of a linked forest productivity-soil process model , 1985 .

[17]  H. Shugart A Theory of Forest Dynamics , 1984 .

[18]  R. Naiman,et al.  Effects of Moose Browsing on Vegetation and Litter of the Boreal Forest, Isle Royale, Michigan, USA , 1992 .

[19]  P. Martín,et al.  EXE: a Climatically Sensitive Model to Study Climate Change and CO2 Enhancement Effects on Forests , 1992 .

[20]  R. C. Anderson,et al.  Recovery of browse-sensitive tree species following release from white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus zimmerman browsing pressure , 1993 .

[21]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth , 1972 .

[22]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  Forest ecosystem dynamics: linking forest succession, soil process and radiation models , 1993 .

[23]  Edward J. Rykiel,et al.  Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation , 1996 .

[24]  Craig Leohle,et al.  Evaluation of theories and calculation tools in ecology , 1983 .

[25]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes , 1993 .

[26]  J. H. Smith,et al.  ADVANTAGES OF THE PARABOLIC EXPRESSION OF HEIGHT-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIPS , 1955 .

[27]  A. Bernatzky Tree ecology and preservation , 1978 .

[28]  R. Putman Ungulates in temperate forest ecosystems: perspectives and recommendations for future research , 1996 .

[29]  R. Neilson A Model for Predicting Continental‐Scale Vegetation Distribution and Water Balance , 1995 .

[30]  W. Cramer,et al.  Assessing Impacts of Climate Change on Vegetation Using Climate Classification Systems , 1993 .

[31]  H. Shugart,et al.  Vegetation Dynamics and Global Change , 1993 .

[32]  Steven W. Running,et al.  A vegetation classification logic-based on remote-sensing for use in global biogeochemical models , 1994 .

[33]  R. Gill A Review of Damage by Mammals in North Temperate Forests: 3. Impact on Trees and Forests , 1992 .

[34]  J. R. Bray,et al.  Gap Phase Replacement in a Maple-Basswood Forest , 1956 .

[35]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .

[36]  Nancy G. Tilghman Impacts of White-Tailed Deer on Forest Regeneration in Northwestern Pennsylvania , 1989 .

[37]  D Gyalistras,et al.  Sensitivity of a forest ecosystem model to climate parametrization schemes. , 1995, Environmental pollution.

[38]  D. Benkert,et al.  Ellenberg, H., Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht 3., verbesserte Aufl. 989 S., 499 Abb. und 130 Tab. Verlag Eugen Ulmer. Stuttgart, 1982. Preis: Ln. m. Schutzumschlag DM 120.— , 1984 .

[39]  W. Alverson,et al.  Forests Too Deer: Edge Effects in Northern Wisconsin , 1988 .

[40]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 4-1993 A Physiology-Based Gap Model of Forest Dynamics , 2017 .

[41]  W. Cramer,et al.  A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate , 1992 .

[42]  Harald Bugmann,et al.  On the ecology of mountainous forests in a changing climate , 1994 .

[43]  A climatic model for location of plant species in Florida, U.S.A. , 1993 .