Perception of concurrent vowels: The effect of varying their relative level

Abstract When identifying pairs of simultaneous steady-state vowels, listeners perform well even when the two vowels start and stop at the same time, are presented monaurally, have the same fundamental frequency ( f 0 ), and have approximately equal intensities. The sensation described by listeners is of one dominant vowel “coloured” by a second or non-dominant vowel. A small difference in f 0 improves performance and typically results in a sensation of two voice sources rather than of one voice coloured by another. An experiment is reported in which four listeners attempted to identify separately the dominant and the non-dominant vowel when the relative levels of the vowels were varied over a 28 dB range and the vowels had either the same f 0 or different f 0 s. As in previous experiments, performance improved when there was an f 0 difference between the vowels, but this advantage was reduced though not abolished when the f 0 separation was one octave. This advantage of f 0 separation was seen almost entirely in increased identification of the non-dominant vowel and was apparent at all but the greatest relative level differences tested. Finally, there were clear differences in the pattern of vowel dominance across the different vowel combinations, with subjects showing broadly similar patterns. Dominance may reflect cognitive “decision” strategies in addition to spectral masking at the level of the peripheral auditory system.

[1]  B. Moore An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[2]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.

[3]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[4]  L. Demany,et al.  The effect of vibrato on the recognition of masked vowels , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Auditory enhancement and the perception of concurrent vowels , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  A R Palmer,et al.  The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. B. Gardner,et al.  Perceptual Separation of Speech from Concurrent Sounds , 1987 .

[8]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Perception of concurrent vowels: effects of harmonic misalignment and pitch-period asynchrony. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C. Darwin,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Human Experimental Psychology Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time Perceptual Grouping of Speech Components Differing in Fundamental Frequency and Onset-time , 2022 .

[10]  A. Bregman,et al.  The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: Pulse train segregation and vowel segregation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with the same fundamental frequency. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[13]  John F. Culling,et al.  Speech perception seen through the ear , 1989, Speech Commun..

[14]  C. M. Marin,et al.  Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E. Carterette,et al.  Some Factors Affecting Multi‐Channel Listening , 1954 .

[16]  The time course of auditory segregation of simultaneous vowels , 1990 .

[17]  D M Green,et al.  Successive versus simultaneous comparison in auditory intensity discrimination. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  U. Tilmann Zwicker,et al.  Auditory recognition of diotic and dichotic vowel pairs , 1984, Speech Commun..

[19]  Q. Summerfield,et al.  Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[21]  Michaël Titus Maria Scheffers,et al.  Sifting vowels. Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. , 1983 .