The dynamics of technological innovation: The sector of antibacterial medicines

Abstract This is an empirical and historical study of the dynamics of technological innovation in antibacterial medicines, a key sector of the pharmaceutical industry. It is based on an analysis of all the innovations that were introduced over the period 1935–1987; from Prontosil, the first sulphonamide, through penicillin and the semisynthetic antibiotics, to the monobactams and the quinolones of the mid-1980s. In the historical section, we describe the influence that antibacterial medicines have had on the structure and research intensity of the innovating companies and through them, on the pharmaceutical industry and its geography. We also describe the catalytic role played by government agencies and universities. In the empirical section, the innovations are evaluated in terms of originality and market performance and are classified into four technological trajectories. Their distribution over time and among technological trajectories, companies and countries, the relation between originality and market performance of individual innovations, the interplay between social needs, market demand and technological innovation, the role of market-successful radical innovations in the launching of technological trajectories, the orientation of subsequent academic and industrial research and the establishment of corporate technology traditions, provide insights in both innovation theory and the dynamics of technological innovation.

[1]  Vivien Walsh,et al.  Invention and innovation in the chemical industry: Demand-pull or discovery-push?☆ , 1993 .

[2]  W. S. Comanor,et al.  The political economy of the pharmaceutical industry. , 1986, Journal of economic literature.

[3]  Joel Mokyr,et al.  The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress , 1991 .

[4]  B. Bloom,et al.  Drug Discovery: Science and Development in a Changing Society , 1971 .

[5]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[6]  Albert B. Schwarzkopf,et al.  A study of innovation in the pesticide industry: Analysis of the innovation record of an industrial sector , 1987 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[8]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on Technology: The direction of technological change: inducement mechanisms and focusing devices , 1969 .

[9]  K. Marx Capital: A Critique of Political Economy , 1867 .

[10]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[11]  D Schwartzman "Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry". , 1978, British medical journal.

[12]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[13]  Erwin K. Kastrup,et al.  Drug facts and comparisons , 1977 .

[14]  Jonathan Liebenau,et al.  Medical Science and Medical Industry: The Formation of the American Pharmaceutical Industry , 1987 .

[15]  Fritz Redlich,et al.  The Emergence of the German Dye Industry. , 1960 .

[16]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Unemployment And Technical Innovation , 1982 .

[17]  K. Pavitt What makes basic research economically useful , 1991 .

[18]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[19]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[20]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[21]  Selman A. Waksman,et al.  The Conquest of Tuberculosis , 2021 .

[22]  N. Rosenberg Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[23]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[24]  John C. Sheehan,et al.  The Enchanted Ring: The Untold Story of Penicillin , 1986 .