Performance comparison of subjective assessment methodologies for Light Field Displays

User experience of 3D visualization on light field displays depends on several technical and human factors. One of these factors is Region of Interest, which determines the properties of visualization, such as the level of zoom. In this paper we present the results of three experiments investigating the effect of level of zoom on Quality of Experience. These experiments use different subjective quality assessment methods to evaluate user experience. Beyond the subjective preference of the visualized 3D content, visual comfort is measured as well.

[1]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  Video quality assessment: From 2D to 3D — Challenges and future trends , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  Margaret H. Pinson,et al.  Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies , 2003, Visual Communications and Image Processing.

[3]  Marcus Barkowsky,et al.  NEW REQUIREMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES FOR 3DTV , 2010 .

[4]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[5]  Lew B. Stelmach,et al.  All subjective scales are not created equal: The effects of context on different scales , 1999, Signal Process..

[6]  Takanori Hayashi,et al.  Performance comparison of subjective assessment methods for 3D video quality , 2012, 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[7]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Viva la resolution: the perceivable differences between image resolutions for light field displays , 2016 .

[8]  T. Tominaga,et al.  Performance comparisons of subjective quality assessment methods for mobile video , 2010, 2010 Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[9]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Perceptual Quality of Reconstructed Medical Images on Projection-Based Light Field Displays , 2016, eHealth 360°.

[10]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Subjective methods for the assessment of stereoscopic 3DTV systems , 2015 .