Editorial The Mission of Marketing Science

[1]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads , 1989 .

[2]  E. Garfield.  Journal impact factor: a brief review. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[3]  J. Gans,et al.  How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists , 1994 .

[4]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Rejected : leading economists ponder the publication process , 1995 .

[5]  David S. Ackerman,et al.  In Search of Diversity: The Record of Major Marketing Journals , 1999 .

[6]  David N. Laband,et al.  Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  J. Armstrong.  Advocacy and Objectivity in Science , 1979 .

[8]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Wine Online: Search Costs Affect Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution , 2000 .

[9]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[10]  Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al.  Guardians of Science: Fairness and Reliability of Peer Review , 1994 .

[11]  Füsun F. Gönül,et al.  Modeling Multiple Sources of Heterogeneity in Multinomial Logit Models: Methodological and Managerial Issues , 1993 .

[12]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Serving Constituencies In Business Schools: M.B.A. Program Versus Research Performance , 2000 .

[13]  Richard Staelin,et al.  From Courtroom to Converse: My 30 Year Journey , 2000 .

[14]  M. Polonsky,et al.  Accessibility: An Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals? , 1999 .

[15]  E. Anderson,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms , 1993 .

[16]  R. Blank.  The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review , 1991 .

[17]  D. Laband.  Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics?: Preliminary Evidence from Authors , 1990 .

[18]  Daniel S. Hamermesh,et al.  Facts and Myths about Refereeing , 1994 .

[19]  Rik Pieters,et al.  The Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Sub-areas , 2000 .

[20]  John G. Lynch.  Presidential Address Reviewing , 1998 .

[21]  S. Ceci,et al.  Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  M. Azbel'.  Could Columbus Have Passed Peer Review , 1993 .

[23]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Publications in Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Scholars and Marketing Departments , 2000 .

[24]  R. G. Hawkins,et al.  What Economists Think of Their Journals , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.