Comparison of peak power and energy requirements in different actuation concepts for active knee prosthesis

In this paper we investigated the peak power (PP) and energy (E) requirements for different active knee actuation concepts at three different gaits. A lower PP or ER requirement is an important issue because it could lead to a smaller motor and less battery chargings. In this paper we compare the PP and E requirements of direct drive (DD), series elastic actuator (SEA), series elastic damping actuator (SEDA) with passive and variable damping and parallel elastic damping actuator (PEDA) with passive and variable damping at level ground walking, stairs ascending and stairs descending. SEDA (variable damping) and PEDA (variable damping) were found to be the best concepts for the reduction of PP and E requirement with an E requirement reduction of 46.3 % and 48.5 % compared to the DD concept (at level ground walking). This advantage comes with the cost and control effort for variable damping. The SEA concept with an E requirement of 23.9 % compared to the DD concept in level ground walking is a suitable option for a simple design.

[1]  Mahdy Eslamy,et al.  Emulation of Ankle Function for Different Gaits through Active Foot Prosthesis: Actuation Concepts, Control and Experiments , 2014 .

[2]  Robert Ilg,et al.  An efficient robotic tendon for gait assistance. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  Michael S Orendurff,et al.  Gait efficiency using the C-Leg. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Hugh Herr,et al.  User-adaptive control of a magnetorheological prosthetic knee , 2003, Ind. Robot.

[5]  R. Riener,et al.  Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[6]  Joseph Edward Shigley,et al.  Standard Handbook of Machine Design , 2004 .

[7]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  A Robotic “Jack Spring”™ for Ankle Gait Assistance , 2005 .

[8]  Angel Gaspar Gonzalez-Rodriguez,et al.  Design and validation of a novel actuator with adaptable compliance for application in human-like robotics , 2009, Ind. Robot.

[9]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Rehabilitation in limb deficiency. 1. Gait and motion analysis. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered Ankle--Foot Prosthesis Improves Walking Metabolic Economy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  O. Schmitt.  The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 2017 .

[14]  Stephan Rinderknecht,et al.  Does it pay to have a damper in a powered ankle prosthesis? A power-energy perspective , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[15]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Self-contained powered knee and ankle prosthesis: Initial evaluation on a transfemoral amputee , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.