Effect of atelectasis changes on tissue mass and dose during lung radiotherapy

Purpose: To characterize mass and density changes of lung parenchyma in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients following midtreatment resolution of atelectasis and to quantify the impact this large geometric change has on normal tissue dose. Methods: Baseline and midtreatment CT images and contours were obtained for 18 NSCLC patients with atelectasis. Patients were classified based on atelectasis volume reduction between the two scans as having either full, partial, or no resolution. Relative mass and density changes from baseline to midtreatment were calculated based on voxel intensity and volume for each lung lobe. Patients also had clinical treatment plans available which were used to assess changes in normal tissue dose constraints from baseline to midtreatment. The midtreatment image was rigidly aligned with the baseline scan in two ways: (1) bony anatomy and (2) carina. Treatment parameters (beam apertures, weights, angles, monitor units, etc.) were transferred to each image. Then, dose was recalculated. Typical IMRT dose constraints were evaluated on all images, and the changes from baseline to each midtreatment image were investigated. Results: Atelectatic lobes experienced mean (stdev) mass changes of −2.8% (36.6%), −24.4% (33.0%), and −9.2% (17.5%) and density changes of −66.0% (6.4%), −25.6% (13.6%), and −17.0% (21.1%) for full, partial, and no resolution, respectively. Means (stdev) of dose changes to spinal cord Dmax, esophagus Dmean, and lungs Dmean were 0.67 (2.99), 0.99 (2.69), and 0.50 Gy (2.05 Gy), respectively, for bone alignment and 0.14 (1.80), 0.77 (2.95), and 0.06 Gy (1.71 Gy) for carina alignment. Dose increases with bone alignment up to 10.93, 7.92, and 5.69 Gy were found for maximum spinal cord, mean esophagus, and mean lung doses, respectively, with carina alignment yielding similar values. 44% and 22% of patients had at least one metric change by at least 5 Gy (dose metrics) or 5% (volume metrics) for bone and carina alignments, respectively. Investigation of GTV coverage showed mean (stdev) changes in VRx, Dmax, and Dmin of −5.5% (13.5%), 2.5% (4.2%), and 0.8% (8.9%), respectively, for bone alignment with similar results for carina alignment. Conclusions: Resolution of atelectasis caused mass and density decreases, on average, and introduced substantial changes in normal tissue dose metrics in a subset of the patient cohort.

[1]  Jan Nyman,et al.  Retrospective cohort study of bronchial doses and radiation-induced atelectasis after stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors located close to the bronchial tree. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  F. Gao,et al.  Trans-bronchoscopy with implantation of 125I radioactive seeds in patients with pulmonary atelectasis induced by lung cancer. , 2015, Oncology letters.

[3]  Lone Hoffmann,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy of lung cancer patients with pleural effusion or atelectasis. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  J. Sonke,et al.  Anatomical Changes During Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer Patients , 2007 .

[5]  Sean S. Park,et al.  Separating the dosimetric consequences of changing tumor anatomy from positional uncertainty for conventionally fractionated lung cancer patients. , 2014, Practical radiation oncology.

[6]  F. Sedlmayer,et al.  Nonresected non-small-cell lung cancer in Stages I through IIIB: accelerated, twice-daily, high-dose radiotherapy--a prospective Phase I/II trial with long-term follow-up. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Intra thoracic anatomical changes in lung cancer patients during the course of radiotherapy. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Geoffrey D Hugo,et al.  Localization accuracy of the clinical target volume during image-guided radiotherapy of lung cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  E. W. Shrigley Medical Physics , 1944, British medical journal.

[10]  P. Poulsen,et al.  Dosimetric impact of respiratory motion, interfraction baseline shifts, and anatomical changes in radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[11]  B C Stoel,et al.  Towards local progression estimation of pulmonary emphysema using CT. , 2014, Medical physics.

[12]  M. Partridge,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer does not underdose the microscopic disease and has the potential to increase tumor control. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.