On the Reliability of Expert Identification of Small-Medium Sized Mammals from Camera Trap Photos

Camera trapping in scientific research has captivated practitioners globally and is now widely used as a primary survey method. Using photos to identify some species, especially coexisting small species of similar appearance and niche is questionable and if incorrectly identified can lead to poor conservation and management outcomes. The aim of our investigation was to test how accurately mammalogists with expertise in mammal identification could identify a range of small-medium sized species recorded during camera trap surveys. This study presents the results of an Australian case study but the findings apply broadly and are relevant throughout the world's ecosystems. Using an internet survey, 58 questions were posed to assess practitioner expertise in mammal trapping, and their accuracy in identifying 21 photos of 10 small-medium sized Australian mammal species. Particular focus was placed on the identification of the rare and threatened Hastings River Mouse (Pseudomys oralis) but other rodent species such as the Black Rat (Rattus rattus), the Bush Rat (Rattus fuscipes), and the Swamp Rat (Rattus lutreolus) were included. The survey indicated that the correct identification of some small mammals, in particular rodents, is highly variable between images of the same species, and that as a whole the professional wildlife community performs poorly at the identification of such species. Identification was more accurate where species were less likely to be confused with similar looking species, or where their identification was simple and/or obvious. Accurate identification of small-medium sized mammals, in particular rodents using camera trap imagery is difficult and this study highlights the potential discrepancies that may arise in wildlife research. Robust methods to assist in minimising errors and bias of animal identification need to be explored. In circumstances where similar looking species coexist, or in species rich ecosystems, a reliance on camera trapping alone may lead to mistaken identity.

[1]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  A Comparative Study of Tests for Homogeneity of Variances, with Applications to the Outer Continental Shelf Bidding Data , 1981 .

[2]  N. L. McKenzie,et al.  Patterns in the modern decline of western Australia's vertebrate fauna: Causes and conservation implications , 1989 .

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  M. J. Saxon,et al.  Use of infrared digital cameras to investigate the behaviour of cryptic species , 2004 .

[5]  D. Swann,et al.  Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: an evaluation and review , 2004 .

[6]  M. Tobler,et al.  An evaluation of camera traps for inventorying large‐ and medium‐sized terrestrial rainforest mammals , 2008 .

[7]  Bart Kranstauber,et al.  Camera traps as sensor networks for monitoring animal communities , 2009, 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[8]  S. Barry,et al.  Detection of medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals using infrared digital cameras: an alternative way forward? , 2010 .

[9]  Zhihai He,et al.  Monitoring wild animal communities with arrays of motion sensitive camera traps , 2010, ArXiv.

[10]  Michael Stevens,et al.  A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities , 2010 .

[11]  Timothy G. O'Brien,et al.  The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels , 2010 .

[12]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera traps in animal ecology : methods and analyses , 2011 .

[13]  J. Ahumada,et al.  Community structure and diversity of tropical forest mammals: data from a global camera trap network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  S. Barry,et al.  There’s no accounting for taste: bait attractants and infrared digital cameras for detecting small to medium ground-dwelling mammals , 2011 .

[15]  R. Barrett,et al.  A History of Camera Trapping , 2011 .

[16]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera Traps in Animal Ecology , 2011 .

[17]  Chaitanya K. Baru,et al.  Data acquisition and management software for camera trap data: A case study from the TEAM Network , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[18]  Paul D. Meek,et al.  User-based design specifications for the ultimate camera trap for wildlife research , 2012, Wildlife Research.

[19]  Justine Smith,et al.  A comparison of vertical and horizontal camera trap orientations for detection of potoroos and bandicoots , 2012 .

[20]  Paul D. Meek,et al.  Temporal activity patterns of the swamp rat (Rattus lutreolus) and other rodents in north-eastern New South Wales, Australia , 2012 .

[21]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .