Towards the Probabilistic Earth-System Model

Multi-model ensembles provide a pragmatic approach to the representation of model uncertainty in climate prediction. However, such representations are inherently ad hoc, and, as shown, probability distributions of climate variables based on current-generation multi-model ensembles, are not accurate. Results from seasonal re-forecast studies suggest that climate model ensembles based on stochastic-dynamic parametrisation are beginning to outperform multi-model ensembles, and have the potential to become significantly more skilful than multi-model ensembles. The case is made for stochastic representations of model uncertainty in future-generation climate prediction models. Firstly, a guiding characteristic of the scientific method is an ability to characterise and predict uncertainty; individual climate models are not currently able to do this. Secondly, through the effects of noise-induced rectification, stochastic-dynamic parametrisation may provide a (poor man's) surrogate to high resolution. Thirdly, stochastic-dynamic parametrisations may be able to take advantage of the inherent stochasticity of electron flow through certain types of low-energy computer chips, currently under development. These arguments have particular resonance for next-generation Earth-System models, which purport to be comprehensive numerical representations of climate, and where integrations at high resolution may be unaffordable.

[1]  G. J. Shutts,et al.  Influence of a stochastic parameterization on the frequency of occurrence of North Pacific weather regimes in the ECMWF model , 2005 .

[2]  Douglas K. Lilly,et al.  Stratified Turbulence and the Mesoscale Variability of the Atmosphere , 1983 .

[3]  Stephen Cusack,et al.  Improved Surface Temperature Prediction for the Coming Decade from a Global Climate Model , 2007, Science.

[4]  Leonid Oliker,et al.  Towards Ultra-High Resolution Models of Climate and Weather , 2008, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[5]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  The rationale behind the success of multi-model ensembles in seasonal forecasting-II , 2005 .

[6]  T. N. Palmer,et al.  Quantifying the risk of extreme seasonal precipitation events in a changing climate , 2002, Nature.

[7]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  Strategies: Revolution in Climate Prediction is Both Necessary and Possible: A Declaration at the World Modelling Summit for Climate Prediction , 2009 .

[8]  T. Palmer.  A nonlinear dynamical perspective on model error: A proposal for non‐local stochastic‐dynamic parametrization in weather and climate prediction models , 2001 .

[9]  E. Lorenz.  Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[10]  Franco Molteni,et al.  Circulation Regimes: Chaotic Variability versus SST-Forced Predictability , 2007 .

[11]  Upmanu Lall,et al.  Probabilistic multimodel regional temperature change projections , 2006 .

[12]  J Berner,et al.  Impact of a quasi-stochastic cellular automaton backscatter scheme on the systematic error and seasonal prediction skill of a global climate model , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Andrew P. Morse,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A EUROPEAN MULTIMODEL ENSEMBLE SYSTEM FOR SEASONAL-TO-INTERANNUAL PREDICTION (DEMETER) , 2004 .

[14]  T. Palmer,et al.  Changing frequency of occurrence of extreme seasonal temperatures under global warming , 2005 .

[15]  G. J. Shutts,et al.  Convective Forcing Fluctuations in a Cloud-Resolving Model: Relevance to the Stochastic Parameterization Problem , 2007 .

[16]  H. Fuks.  Nondeterministic density classification with diffusive probabilistic cellular automata. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models , 2007 .

[18]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Probability of regional climate change based on the Reliability Ensemble Averaging (REA) method , 2003 .