Experiencing LoRa Network Establishment on a Smart Energy Campus Testbed

The fundamental properties of long-range (LoRa) performance have been revealed by previous research, but advanced issues remain unresolved. This paper tackles three technical challenges that are confronted when establishing a LoRa network on a smart energy campus testbed in Korea. First, the communication range of LoRa in a combined indoor and outdoor environment has yet to be determined. To address this problem, this study builds a LoRa testbed from which we measure the propagation properties of radio signals in a combined environment. Then, we establish a simplified path loss model for LoRa PHY and compute the communication range. Next, national regulations enforce the use of the Listen-Before-Talk (LBT) scheduling scheme, but its performance has never been examined. This paper enumerates the impacts of LBT, threshold values, back-off algorithms, and application parameters on LoRa Medium Access Control (MAC) performance. Last, the application parameters required by the smart energy scenario influence LoRa performance, but their impacts have been scarcely reported. Based on the application parameters and experimental results, this paper proposes a strategy to deploy LoRa gateway(s) and nodes on the campus. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first work that considers performance issues when establishing a LoRa network on a real-world application testbed.

[1]  P. Wertz,et al.  Dominant Path Prediction Model for Indoor Scenarios , 2005 .

[2]  Ali Ahmadinia,et al.  Evaluation of LoRa and LoRaWAN for wireless sensor networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE SENSORS.

[3]  Panwit Tuwanut,et al.  A survey on IoT architectures, protocols, applications, security, privacy, real-world implementation and future trends , 2015 .

[4]  Ahcène Bounceur,et al.  A study of LoRa low power and wide area network technology , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP).

[5]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[6]  Ankur Mehta,et al.  Reliability through frequency diversity: why channel hopping makes sense , 2009, PE-WASUN '09.

[7]  Mohammad Mohammadi Erbati,et al.  Analysis of LoRaWAN technology in an Outdoor and an Indoor Scenario in Duisburg-Germany , 2018, 2018 3rd International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS).

[8]  Andrzej Duda,et al.  Simulation of LoRa in NS-3: Improving LoRa Performance with CSMA , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[9]  Julien Montavont,et al.  Indoor deployment of low-power wide area networks (LPWAN): A LoRaWAN case study , 2016, 2016 IEEE 12th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[10]  Thomas H. Clausen,et al.  A Study of LoRa: Long Range & Low Power Networks for the Internet of Things , 2016, Sensors.

[11]  Dirk Grunwald,et al.  A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and Coverage Mapping Methods , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  Scalability Analysis of Large-Scale LoRaWAN Networks in ns-3 , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[13]  Thomas Watteyne,et al.  Understanding the Limits of LoRaWAN , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Mikkel Thorup,et al.  Wireless coverage prediction via parametric shortest paths , 2018, MobiHoc.

[15]  Adnan M. Abu-Mahfouz,et al.  IoT devices and applications based on LoRa/LoRaWAN , 2017, IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[16]  Mahesh Sooriyabandara,et al.  Does Bidirectional Traffic Do More Harm Than Good in LoRaWAN Based LPWA Networks? , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[17]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Internet of Things: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.