Neural networksandpatternrecognition techniques have been effectively used in characterizingand classifying patterns.In this paper, we focus on the performanceof both techniques in classifying ultrasonic transducers.The work was aimed at comparingthe performanceof both techniques for : (1) preclustering of transducers into classes; (2)~ognizing transducers.‘l’hecharacterizationalgorithms used are based on neural network and pattern recognition techniques. The competitive learning technique provides poor results as compared to the K-Means for prtxlustering. While for recognition, it is found that artificial neural network techniques provide tkr better classifkation nsults as compared to the pattern remgnition techniques. A multilayerbackpmpagation neural network is developed for characterizing the transducers which provides a misclassifwation rate of 6%. Two other multilayer neural networks, sum-of-products and a newly devised neural network called hybrid sum-of-products have a misclassification rateof 10%and 7%, respectively. The best patternrecognition technique for this application is found to be the perception which provides a misclassification rate of 23%. The worst patternrecognition technique is found to be the Bayes’ theorem method which provides a misclassification rate of 54%. Index Terms Performance Evaluation, Neural Networks, Pattern Recognition, Ultrasonic Transducers, Classification, CharacterizationTechniques. Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that tha oopies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notica and the title of the publication and ite date appear, and notice is givan that cop~ngiaby permissionof theAssociationfor Computing Machinery.Tc copyotherwise,cr to republish,requiresa fee and/orspecificpermieeion. 01992 AcM o.aglgl.sOz-x/gz~ z/lzsd...$ 1.So
[1]
Wei-Chung Lin,et al.
A hierarchical multiple-view approach to three-dimensional object recognition
,
1991,
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[2]
K Fukushima,et al.
Handwritten alphanumeric character recognition by the neocognitron
,
1991,
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[3]
R. S. Sharpe,et al.
Research techniques in nondestructive testing
,
1970
.
[4]
Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.
An automated system for characterizing ultrasonic transducers using pattern recognition
,
1992
.
[5]
Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.
Dimensionality reduction and feature extraction applications in identifying computer users
,
1991,
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[6]
Julius T. Tou,et al.
Pattern Recognition Principles
,
1974
.
[7]
Bart Kosko,et al.
Differential competitive learning for centroid estimation and phoneme recognition
,
1991,
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[8]
Alexander H. Waibel,et al.
A novel objective function for improved phoneme recognition using time delay neural networks
,
1990,
International 1989 Joint Conference on Neural Networks.
[9]
J. Tou.
Engineering Principles of Pattern Recognition
,
1969
.
[10]
Teuvo Kohonen,et al.
The 'neural' phonetic typewriter
,
1988,
Computer.
[11]
Kunihiko Fukushima,et al.
A neural network for visual pattern recognition
,
1988,
Computer.
[12]
Bernard Widrow,et al.
30 years of adaptive neural networks: perceptron, Madaline, and backpropagation
,
1990,
Proc. IEEE.
[13]
M. A. Girshick,et al.
Theory of games and statistical decisions
,
1955
.
[14]
D. Robert Hay,et al.
Pattern recognition of ultrasonic signals for detection of wall thinning
,
1988
.