Frequency specific impairment of automatic pitch change detection by fMRI acoustic noise: An MEG study

The loud acoustic noise produced by the magnetic resonance scanner is a major source of interference in auditory fMRI research. Whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to investigate the interaction between the frequency range of auditory stimulation and fMRI acoustic noise. Pure tones and 3-harmonic complexes varying between 240 and 1240 Hz in frequency were presented while participants attended to a silent subtitled film. Continuous fMRI acoustic noise was presented during half of the blocks. The activity in six regions of interest was analyzed in 100-200 and 200-300 ms time windows to evaluate the magnetic counterparts of the mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a brain responses. The results suggested that fMRI noise significantly reduced the amplitude of these responses. The effect of the noise on the automatic processing of the tones was more prominent for the tones with frequencies higher than 500 Hz. It is recommended that in the MMN protocols using continuous fMRI acquisition the sound stimuli should be spectrally separated from the fMRI scanner noise spectrum.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Teemu Rinne,et al.  Superior temporal and inferior frontal cortices are activated by infrequent sound duration decrements: an fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  K. Alho,et al.  Separate Time Behaviors of the Temporal and Frontal Mismatch Negativity Sources , 2000, NeuroImage.

[4]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Frequency discrimination at different frequency levels as indexed by electrophysiological and behavioral measures. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  André Brechmann,et al.  Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Friederici,et al.  Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[11]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[12]  E. Schröger,et al.  Differential Contribution of Frontal and Temporal Cortices to Auditory Change Detection: fMRI and ERP Results , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  F. Perrin,et al.  Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Carrie J. Scarff,et al.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Background acoustic noise and the hemispheric lateralization of speech processing in the human brain: magnetic mismatch negativity study , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  W. Edmister,et al.  Nonlinearity of FMRI responses in human auditory cortex , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[17]  N. Kiang,et al.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[19]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory , 1994, Nature.

[20]  R Hari,et al.  Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[22]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[24]  I. Winkler,et al.  The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Th R Knösche,et al.  Transformation of Whole-Head MEG Recordings Between Different Sensor Positions / Transformation von Ganzkopf-MEG-Messungen zwischen verschiedenen Sensorpositionen , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[26]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Memory‐related processing of complex sound patterns in human auditory cortex: a MEG study , 1993, Neuroreport.

[27]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[28]  I. Winkler,et al.  Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP). , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Abstract phoneme representations in the left temporal cortex: magnetic mismatch negativity study , 2002, Neuroreport.

[30]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[31]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category‐specific semantic information: the mismatch negativity to action words , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[32]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Is It Tonotopy after All? , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  Bradley G. Goodyear,et al.  Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials , 2004, NeuroImage.

[34]  K. Alho,et al.  Lateralized automatic auditory processing of phonetic versus musical information: A PET study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Simultaneous ERP and fMRI of the auditory cortex in a passive oddball paradigm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  D. Hall,et al.  Heschl’s gyrus is more sensitive to tone level than non-primary auditory cortex , 2002, Hearing Research.

[37]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Functional anatomy of pitch memory—an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[38]  R Näätänen,et al.  Effects of spectral complexity and sound duration on automatic complex-sound pitch processing in humans – a mismatch negativity study , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  Adriaan Moelker,et al.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[40]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[41]  G. Mangun,et al.  Tonotopy in human auditory cortex examined with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[42]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[43]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The neural circuitry of pre-attentive auditory change-detection: an fMRI study of pitch and duration mismatch negativity generators. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Effects of Acoustic Gradient Noise from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Auditory Processing as Reflected by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, NeuroImage.

[45]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball. , 1999, Psychophysiology.