An intercomparison of CFD models to predict lean and non-uniform hydrogen mixture explosions

The paper describes an exercise on comparison of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models to predict deflagrations of a lean uniform hydrogen–air mixture and a mixture with hydrogen concentration gradient. The exercise was conducted within the work-package “Standard Benchmark Exercise Problem” of the EC funded Network of Excellence “Safety of Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier”, which seeks to provide necessary quality in the area of applied hydrogen safety simulations. The experiments on hydrogen–air mixture deflagrations in a closed 1.5 m in diameter and 5.7 m high cylindrical vessel were chosen as a benchmark problem to validate CFD codes and combustion models used for prediction of hazards in safety engineering. Simulations of two particular experiments with approximately the same amount of hydrogen were conducted: deflagration of a uniform 12.8% vol. hydrogen mixture and deflagration of a non-uniform hydrogen mixture, corresponding to an average 12.6 % vol. hydrogen concentration (27% at the top of the vessel, 2.5% at the bottom of the vessel) with ignition at the top of the vessel in both cases. The comparison of the simulation results for pressure and flame dynamics against the experimental data is reported.

[1]  F. E. Wells,et al.  Investigation of Turbulent Flames , 1951 .

[2]  B. Hjertager,et al.  On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion , 1977 .

[3]  M. Heitsch,et al.  An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage , 2009 .

[4]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986, Physical review letters.

[5]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  An intercomparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict distribution and mixing of H2 in a closed vessel , 2007 .

[6]  Jerzy Chomiak,et al.  Turbulent flame speed and thickness: phenomenology, evaluation, and application in multi-dimensional simulations , 2002 .

[7]  Victor Yakhot,et al.  Propagation Velocity of Premixed Turbulent Flames , 1988 .

[8]  V. R. Kuznetsov,et al.  Turbulence and combustion , 1990 .

[9]  S. Orszag,et al.  Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory , 1986 .

[10]  Y. A. Gostintsev,et al.  Self-similar propagation of a free turbulent flame in mixed gas mixtures , 1988 .

[11]  Bjørn H. Hjertager,et al.  Computer modelling of turbulent gas explosions in complex 2D and 3D geometries , 1993 .

[12]  C. Paillard,et al.  Laminar flame velocity determination for H2-air-steam mixtures using the spherical bomb method , 2002 .

[13]  D. Whitehouse,et al.  Combustion of stratified hydrogen-air mixtures in the 10.7 m3 combustion test facility cylinder , 1996 .

[14]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to simulate hydrogen deflagrations in a tunnel , 2009 .

[15]  A. A. Efimenko,et al.  CREBCOM code system for description of gaseous combustion , 2001 .

[16]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  LES modelling of an unconfined large-scale hydrogen–air deflagration , 2006 .

[17]  B. Launder,et al.  THE NUMERICAL COMPUTATION OF TURBULENT FLOW , 1974 .

[18]  Dieter Kranzlmüller,et al.  Parallel Grid Adaptation and Dynamic Load Balancing for a CFD Solver , 2005, PVM/MPI.

[19]  M. Heitsch,et al.  An inter-comparison exercise on CFD model capabilities to predict a hydrogen explosion in a simulated vehicle refuelling environment , 2009 .