Evolution of cybernetics: philosophical and methodological analysis

Purpose The aim of this paper is to elaborate the connection between the evolution of cybernetics and the development of scientific rationality (classical, non-classical, post-non-classical) and to emphasize the relevance of the formation of post-non-classical cybernetics for self-developing reflexive-active environment (the third-order cybernetics). Design/methodology/approach This paper includes interdisciplinary analysis of the evolution of cybernetics and possible directions of its development. Findings A connection between the types of scientific rationality (classical, non-classical and post-non-classical) and the stages of the development cybernetics is presented. Classical rationality is first-order cybernetics dealing with observed systems (an external observer). Non-classical rationality is second-order cybernetics dealing with observing systems (built-in observer). Post-non-classical rationality is third-order cybernetics dealing with the self-developing reflexive-active environment (distributed observer). Research limitations/implications This is an initial theoretical conceptualization, which needs a broader assessment and case studies. Practical implications This proposed direction for the analysis of cybernetics opens new approaches to social control on the basis of the subject-focused models and integration of traditional cybernetic tools. Social implications Third-order cybernetics will promote the development of civil society. Direct democracy receives new tools for development. Originality/value The value of this research is in the interdisciplinary analysis of the cybernetics evolution and in new possible directions for its development.

[1]  Dmitry A. Novikov.  Cybernetics: From Past to Future , 2015 .

[2]  L. Hurwicz.  On informationally decentralized systems , 1977 .

[3]  K. Müller.  The Multiple Faces of Reflexive Research Designs 1 , 2015 .

[4]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The methodology of scientific research programmes: Contents , 1978 .

[5]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[6]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[7]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[8]  V. Smith.  Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science , 1982 .

[9]  N. Luhmann.  THE WORLD SOCIETY AS A SOCIAL SYSTEM , 1982 .

[10]  F. H. Adler.  Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[11]  Stuart A. Umpleby,et al.  Second-Order Science: Logic, Strategies, Methods , 2014 .

[12]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[13]  Vladimir A. Lefebvre.  Algebra of conscience , 1982 .

[14]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[15]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[16]  L. Vygotsky.  Genesis of the higher mental functions. , 1991 .

[17]  E. Maskin.  Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality , 1999 .

[18]  R. Aumann.  Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies , 1974 .

[19]  M. Polanyi.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[20]  K. Müller,et al.  The Multiple Faces of Reflexive Research Designs , 2016 .

[21]  Vladimir A. Lefebvre.  SECOND ORDER CYBERNETICS IN THE SOVIET UNION AND THE WEST , 1986 .

[22]  Valentin F. Turchin,et al.  The Phenomenon of Science a cybernetic approach to human evolution , 1977 .