Comparison of five in vitro bioassays to measure estrogenic activity in environmental waters.

Bioassays are well established in the pharmaceutical industry and single compound analysis, but there is still uncertainty about their usefulness in environmental monitoring. We compared the responses of five bioassays designed to measure estrogenic activity (the yeast estrogen screen, ER-CALUX, MELN, T47D-KBluc, and E-SCREEN assays) and chemical analysis on extracts from four different water sources (groundwater, raw sewage, treated sewage, and river water). All five bioassays displayed similar trends and there was good agreement with analytical chemistry results. The data from the ER-CALUX and E-SCREEN bioassays were robust and predictable, and well-correlated with predictions from chemical analysis. The T47D-KBluc appeared likewise promising, but with a more limited sample size it was less compelling. The YES assay was less sensitive than the other assays by an order of magnitude, which resulted in a larger number of nondetects. The MELN assay was less predictable, although the possibility that this was due to laboratory-specific difficulties cannot be discounted. With standardized bioassay data analysis and consistency of operating protocols, bioanalytical tools are a promising advance in the development of a tiered approach to environmental water quality monitoring.

[1]  J. Westendorf,et al.  Comparison of an array of in vitro assays for the assessment of the estrogenic potential of natural and synthetic estrogens, phytoestrogens and xenoestrogens. , 2001, Toxicology.

[2]  Anne Marie Vinggaard,et al.  Effects of currently used pesticides in assays for estrogenicity, androgenicity, and aromatase activity in vitro. , 2002, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[3]  W. Körner.  Development of a sensitive E-screen assay for quantitative analysis of estrogenic activity in municipal sewage plant effluents , 1999 .

[4]  I. Meerts,et al.  In vitro estrogenicity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hydroxylated PDBEs, and polybrominated bisphenol A compounds. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Critical parameters in the MCF-7 cell proliferation bioassay (E-Screen) , 2002, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[6]  C Sonnenschein,et al.  The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  Karen A Kidd,et al.  Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  L. Folmar,et al.  A comparison of the estrogenic potencies of estradiol, ethynylestradiol, diethylstilbestrol, nonylphenol and methoxychlor in vivo and in vitro. , 2002, Aquatic toxicology.

[9]  R. Bruhn,et al.  Analysis of estrogenic activity in coastal surface waters of the Baltic Sea using the yeast estrogen screen. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[10]  D. Moras,et al.  Binding of Estrogenic Compounds to Recombinant Estrogen Receptor-α: Application to Environmental Analysis , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Optimization of a yeast estrogen screen and its applicability to study the release of estrogenic isoflavones from a soygerm powder. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  J. Meerman,et al.  Detection of estrogenic potency in wastewater and surface water with three in vitro bioassays , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[13]  A Wenzel,et al.  Potencies of estrogenic compounds in in vitro screening assays and in life cycle tests with zebrafish in vivo. , 2003, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  L. Tremblay,et al.  Bioassay-derived androgenic and estrogenic activity in municipal sewage in Australia and New Zealand. , 2006, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[15]  R. Schwarzenbach,et al.  The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems , 2006, Science.

[16]  C. Casellas,et al.  Estrogenic Activity in Water and Sediments of a French River: Contribution of Alkylphenols , 2003, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[17]  J. van Vuren,et al.  Histological evidence of intersex in feral sharptooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus) from an estrogen‐polluted water source in Gauteng, South Africa , 2004, Environmental toxicology.

[18]  D. Hawker,et al.  Comprehensive study of endocrine disrupting compounds using grab and passive sampling at selected wastewater treatment plants in South East Queensland, Australia. , 2007, Environment international.

[19]  H. Bartsch,et al.  Validation and application of a rapid in vitro assay for assessing the estrogenic potency of halogenated phenolic chemicals. , 1998, Chemosphere.

[20]  C. Tyler,et al.  An Assessment of the Model of Concentration Addition for Predicting the Estrogenic Activity of Chemical Mixtures in Wastewater Treatment Works Effluents , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[21]  Edwin J. Routledge,et al.  Identification of Estrogenic Chemicals in STW Effluent. 2. In Vivo Responses in Trout and Roach , 1998 .

[22]  H Fang,et al.  Quantitative comparisons of in vitro assays for estrogenic activities. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  H. Tanaka,et al.  Comparison between estrogenicities estimated from DNA recombinant yeast assay and from chemical analyses of endocrine disruptors during sewage treatment. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  L Earl Gray,et al.  Development and characterization of a cell line that stably expresses an estrogen-responsive luciferase reporter for the detection of estrogen receptor agonist and antagonists. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[25]  L. Tremblay,et al.  Development of methods for extraction and in vitro quantification of estrogenic and androgenic activity of wastewater samples. , 2006, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Toxicology & pharmacology : CBP.

[26]  M. Scholze,et al.  Relative potencies and combination effects of steroidal estrogens in fish. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  V. Hanf,et al.  Development of a sensitive E-screen assay for quantitative analysis of estrogenic activity in municipal sewage plant effluents. , 1999, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Charles R. Tyler,et al.  Endocrine disruption in wild freshwater fish , 2003 .

[29]  Willem G Schoonen,et al.  Comparison of in vitro and in vivo screening models for androgenic and estrogenic activities. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[30]  J. Nicolas,et al.  Reporter cell lines to study the estrogenic effects of xenoestrogens. , 1999, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Walter Giger,et al.  Combined biological and chemical assessment of estrogenic activities in wastewater treatment plant effluents , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[32]  J. Thomsen,et al.  Mechanisms of estrogen action. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[33]  Juliette Legler,et al.  Biological measurement of estrogenic activity in urine and bile conjugates with the in vitro ER‐CALUX reporter gene assay , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[34]  T. Croley,et al.  Estrogenic potency of chemicals detected in sewage treatment plant effluents as determined by in vivo assays with Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[35]  Patricia Burkhardt-Holm,et al.  Estrogenicity patterns in the Swiss midland river Lützelmurg in relation to treated domestic sewage effluent discharges and hydrology , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[36]  Jörg E Drewes,et al.  An Assessment of Endocrine Disrupting Activity Changes during Wastewater Treatment through the Use of Bioassays and Chemical Measurements , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[37]  Edwin J. Routledge,et al.  Estrogenic activity of surfactants and some of their degradation products assessed using a recombinant yeast screen , 1996 .

[38]  H. Leffers,et al.  Comparison of short-term estrogenicity tests for identification of hormone-disrupting chemicals. , 1999 .

[39]  R. Verheyen,et al.  Comparative study on the in vitro/in vivo estrogenic potencies of 17β-estradiol, estrone, 17α-ethynylestradiol and nonylphenol , 2004 .

[40]  A D Vethaak,et al.  Development of a stably transfected estrogen receptor-mediated luciferase reporter gene assay in the human T47D breast cancer cell line. , 1999, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[41]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Experimental parameters affecting sensitivity and specificity of a yeast assay for estrogenic compounds: results of an interlaboratory validation exercise , 2006, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[42]  C. Sonnenschein,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of in vitro assays for estrogenic and androgenic activity. , 2006, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[43]  Beate I Escher,et al.  Comparative analysis of estrogenic activity in sewage treatment plant effluents involving three in vitro assays and chemical analysis of steroids , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[44]  Y. Lévi,et al.  Assessment of river contamination by estrogenic compounds in Paris area (France). , 2004, The Science of the total environment.