Data-driven methods for dockless bike infrastructure planning

In this work we address the problem of data-driven placement of critical bike infrastructure to address user route demand. The proposed framework uses trip origin-destination data that is commonly produced by bike share operators and included in standard data feeds. It does not require intermediate trip GPS data, which is not yet widely available. To compensate for lack of full path information in the data, the proposed method estimates the path of each trip using a shortest path routing algorithm, which runs on a bike-accessible network graph with user preferences. We apply this path estimation to each trip, which results in a volume estimate on each edge in the network graph. We can then assess the effectiveness of infrastructure upgrades from trip distance coverage and user impact perspectives. The framework is applied on a data set of tens of thousands of dockless bike share trips that occurred during the first month of a pilot program with ofo bikes at Vanderbilt University. Case study findings demonstrate that approximately 40% of observed trip distance can be covered by improving only 5% of the infrastructure and 75% of trips will travel some portion of their path on the upgraded infrastructure. This highlights the significant potential benefits for a modest infrastructure investment. While the capture rates may be different on each network, the methodological tools are applicable to data from any docked or dockless bike share system and infrastructure network. The tools will serve as the basis for a software platform that will help any city analyze data collected from shared use mobility devices including bikes and electric scooters and assess infrastructure investment.

[1]  D. Niemeier,et al.  Bicycle Journey-to-Work: Travel Behavior Characteristics and Spatial Attributes , 1997 .

[2]  Erik Jenelius,et al.  Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems : A discussion of recent research , 2015 .

[3]  Yanhua Li,et al.  Planning Bike Lanes based on Sharing-Bikes' Trajectories , 2017, KDD.

[4]  Jennifer Dill Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure , 2009, Journal of public health policy.

[5]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  A detailed analysis of how an urban trail system affects cyclists’ travel , 2007 .

[6]  Laurence R. Rilett,et al.  Heuristic shortest path algorithms for transportation applications: State of the art , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[8]  Patricia Jasmin Krenn,et al.  Route choices of transport bicyclists: a comparison of actually used and shortest routes , 2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[9]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[10]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data , 2012 .

[11]  Changshan Wu,et al.  Bicycle facility planning using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis , 2010 .

[12]  S. Derrible,et al.  Network Analysis of World Subway Systems Using Updated Graph Theory , 2009 .

[13]  Michael Grant,et al.  How Far Out of the Way Will We Travel? , 2010 .

[14]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Benefit-Cost Analysis of Added Bicycle Phase at Existing Signalized Intersection , 2002 .