Video Visits Using the Zoom for Healthcare Platform for People Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis and Nephrologists: A Feasibility Study in Alberta, Canada

Background: Demand for virtual visits (an online synchronous medical appointment between a health care provider and patient) is increasing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There may be additional benefits of virtual visits as they appear to be convenient and potentially cost-saving to patients. People receiving maintenance hemodialysis require ongoing care from their nephrologist and may benefit from virtual visits; however, the optimal model for a virtual kidney clinic is unknown. Objective: To codesign and assess the feasibility of a virtual (video) kidney clinic model with clinic staff, nephrologists, and patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, to be used for routine follow-up visits. Design: Mixed-methods study. Setting: Two main kidney clinics in central Calgary, Alberta. Participants: Adults with kidney failure receiving maintenance hemodialysis, nephrologists, and clinic staff. Methods: First, we individually interviewed clinic staff and nephrologists to assess the needs of the clinic to deliver virtual visits. Then, we used participant observation with patients and nephrologists to codesign the virtual visit model. Finally, we used structured surveys to evaluate the patients’ and nephrologists’ experiences when using the virtual model. Results: Eight video visits (8 patients; 6 nephrologists) were scheduled between October 2019 and February 2020 and 7 were successfully completed. Among completed visits, all participants reported high satisfaction with the service, were willing to use it again, and would recommend it to others. Three main themes were identified with respect to factors influencing visit success: IT infrastructure, administration, and process. Limitations: Patients received training on how to use the videoconference platform by the PhD student, whom also set up the technical components of the visit for the nephrologist. This may have overestimated the feasibility of virtual visits if this level of support is not available in future. Second, interviews were not audio-recorded and thematic analysis relied on field notes. Conclusions: Video visits for routine follow-up care between people receiving hemodialysis and nephrologists were acceptable to patients and nephrologists. Video visits appear to be feasible if clinics are equipped with appropriate equipment and IT infrastructure, physicians are remunerated appropriately, and patients receive training on how to use software as needed.

[1]  A. Wright,et al.  The Invisible Epidemic: Neglected Chronic Disease Management During COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  Donna M. Zulman,et al.  Enhancing patient engagement during virtual care: A conceptual model and rapid implementation at an academic medical center , 2020, Nejm Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery.

[3]  A. Bello,et al.  eVisits in Rural Hemodialysis Care: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives on Design and Potential Impact to Care. , 2020, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[4]  C. Buskens,et al.  Video consultation during follow up care: effect on quality of care and patient- and provider attitude in patients with colorectal cancer , 2020, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  L. Vogel Canada has long way to go on virtual care , 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[6]  C. Nelson,et al.  Telemedicine for Pediatric Urologic Postoperative Care is Safe, Convenient and Economical. , 2020, The Journal of urology.

[7]  A. Goodman,et al.  Comparison of telemedicine versus in-person visits for persons with multiple sclerosis: A randomized crossover study of feasibility, cost, and satisfaction. , 2019, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.

[8]  S. Archer,et al.  Home Virtual Visits for Outpatient Follow-Up Stroke Care: Cross-Sectional Study , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Vidhi Thakkar,et al.  Patient Empowerment: The Role of Technology , 2019, ITCH.

[10]  Adam B. Cohen,et al.  Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. , 2019, The American journal of managed care.

[11]  J. Cowie,et al.  Evaluation of a Digital Consultation and Self-Care Advice Tool in Primary Care: A Multi-Methods Study , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  J. Cain,et al.  The Emerging Issue of Digital Empathy , 2016, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[13]  R. Thompson,et al.  Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. , 2015, European urology.

[14]  F. Niessen,et al.  Implementing Real-Time Video Consultation in Plastic Surgery , 2015, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[15]  Michael T. Bull,et al.  Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of 'Virtual House Calls' for Parkinson Disease , 2013, JAMA neurology.

[16]  Justin Keen,et al.  Key challenges in the development and implementation of telehealth projects , 2011, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[17]  J. Weiner,et al.  An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada , 2011, BMC health services research.

[18]  T. Utsugi,et al.  Doctor-patient communication: a comparison between telemedicine consultation and face-to-face consultation. , 2007, Internal medicine.

[19]  Stefan V. Pantazi,et al.  Success factors for telehealth - A case study , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[20]  P A Jennett,et al.  Preparing for success: readiness models for rural telehealth. , 2005, Journal of postgraduate medicine.