When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures?

We explore the conditions under which firms are likely to pursue equity investment in new ventures as a way to source innovative ideas. We find that firms invest more in new ventures—commonly referred to as ‘corporate venture capital’—in industries with weak intellectual property protection and, to some extent, in industries with high technological ferment and where complementary distribution capability is important. Furthermore, we find that the greater a firm's cash flow and absorptive capacity, the more likely it is to invest. Our results suggest that in Schumpeterian environments incumbents may supplement their innovative efforts by tapping into the knowledge generated by new ventures. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Why do firms cooperate on R&D? an empirical study , 1992 .

[3]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Prospects for Developing Absorptive Capacity Through Internal Information Provision , 2004 .

[4]  F. Rothaermel.  Strategic Management Journal Research Note Incumbent's Advantage through Exploiting Complementary Assets via Interfirm Cooperation , 2022 .

[5]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Corporate venture capital and the creation of U.S.Public Companies: The impact of sources of venture capital on the performance of portfolio companies , 2000 .

[6]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[7]  Terry E. Winters,et al.  Venture capital investing for corporate development objectives , 1988 .

[8]  Z. Ács,et al.  The Internationalization of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Policy Perspective , 1997 .

[9]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[10]  Toby E. Stuart.  Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Management of Innovation , 1994 .

[13]  R. Gulati.  Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[14]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[15]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia , 2000 .

[16]  E. Muller,et al.  Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity , 1995 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[18]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[19]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[20]  Charles P. Himmelberg,et al.  R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries , 1994 .

[21]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity , 1986 .

[22]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technology Regimes and New Firm Formation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[23]  A. Gambardella.  Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s * , 1992 .

[24]  P. Roberts.  Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1999 .

[25]  David H. Hsu.  What Do Entrepreneurs Pay for Venture Capital Affiliation? , 2002 .

[26]  G. Hamel.  Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[27]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[28]  David H. Hsu,et al.  When Does Start-Up Innovation Spur the Gale of Creative Destruction? , 2000 .

[29]  G. Pisano.  The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry☆ , 1991 .

[30]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[31]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Making sense of corporate venture capital. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[32]  William D. Bygrave,et al.  The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms , 1988 .

[33]  Bronwyn H Hall.  Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter? , 1992 .

[34]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[35]  J. Gans,et al.  Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction , 1999 .

[36]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Errors in Variables in Panel Data , 1984 .

[38]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[39]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Successes: Organizational Structure, Incentives, and Complementarities , 1998 .

[40]  Gary Dushnitsky,et al.  Limitations to Inter-Organizational Knowledge Acquisition: The Paradox of Corporate Venture Capital , 2004 .

[41]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  The Venture Capital Revolution , 2001 .

[42]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[43]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation , 2000 .

[44]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[45]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Corporate venture capitalists: Autonomy, obstacles, and performance , 1988 .

[46]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[47]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  Technological cooperative agreements and firm's R & D intensity. A note on causality relations , 1996 .

[48]  Zenas Block,et al.  Corporate Venturing: Creating New Businesses Within the Firm , 1993 .

[49]  M. Lenox,et al.  When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates , 2005 .

[50]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .

[51]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[52]  Paul A. Gompers.  Optimal Investment, Monitoring, and the Staging of Venture Capital , 1995 .

[53]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[54]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[55]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[56]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures , 1999 .

[57]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Asymmetric Information, Financing Constraints, and Investment , 1987 .

[58]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .