Adaptability of non-genetic diversity in bacterial chemotaxis

Bacterial chemotaxis systems are as diverse as the environments that bacteria inhabit, but how much environmental variation can cells tolerate with a single system? Diversification of a single chemotaxis system could serve as an alternative, or even evolutionary stepping-stone, to switching between multiple systems. We hypothesized that mutations in gene regulation could lead to heritable control of chemotactic diversity. By simulating foraging and colonization of E. coli using a single-cell chemotaxis model, we found that different environments selected for different behaviors. The resulting trade-offs show that populations facing diverse environments would ideally diversify behaviors when time for navigation is limited. We show that advantageous diversity can arise from changes in the distribution of protein levels among individuals, which could occur through mutations in gene regulation. We propose experiments to test our prediction that chemotactic diversity in a clonal population could be a selectable trait that enables adaptation to environmental variability. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03526.001

[1]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Thermal Robustness of Signaling in Bacterial Chemotaxis , 2011, Cell.

[2]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Phenotypic diversity as an adaptation to environmental uncertainty , 2008 .

[3]  Victor Sourjik,et al.  Co-expression of signaling proteins improves robustness of the bacterial chemotaxis pathway. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  Mingshan Li,et al.  Nanodiscs separate chemoreceptor oligomeric states and reveal their signaling properties. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  H. Mobley,et al.  Role of Motility in the Colonization of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli in the Urinary Tract , 2005, Infection and Immunity.

[6]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[7]  O. Kuipers,et al.  Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. , 2008, Annual review of microbiology.

[8]  R. Kolter,et al.  Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  Sebastian Thiem,et al.  Determinants of chemoreceptor cluster formation in Escherichia coli , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[11]  B. Cookson,et al.  Non-genetic diversity shapes infectious capacity and host resistance. , 2012, Trends in microbiology.

[12]  Sui Huang.  Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise , 2009, Development.

[13]  V. Sourjik,et al.  Dynamic map of protein interactions in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Precise adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through “assistance neighborhoods” , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Sebastian Thiem,et al.  Protein exchange dynamics at chemoreceptor clusters in Escherichia coli , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  T. Hwa,et al.  Interdependence of Cell Growth and Gene Expression: Origins and Consequences , 2010, Science.

[17]  T. Kariu,et al.  Borrelia burgdorferi Needs Chemotaxis To Establish Infection in Mammals and To Accomplish Its Enzootic Cycle , 2012, Infection and Immunity.

[18]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[19]  Marcos,et al.  Resource Patch Formation and Exploitation throughout the Marine Microbial Food Web , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Y. Tu,et al.  An allosteric model for heterogeneous receptor complexes: understanding bacterial chemotaxis responses to multiple stimuli. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  H. J. Beaumont,et al.  Experimental evolution of bet hedging , 2009, Nature.

[22]  J. Timmer,et al.  Design principles of a bacterial signalling network , 2005, Nature.

[23]  O Shoval,et al.  Evolutionary Trade-Offs, Pareto Optimality, and the Geometry of Phenotype Space , 2012, Science.

[24]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Interdependence of behavioural variability and response to small stimuli in bacteria , 2010, Nature.

[25]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  The energy-speed-accuracy tradeoff in sensory adaptation , 2012, Nature Physics.

[26]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Dependence of Bacterial Chemotaxis on Gradient Shape and Adaptation Rate , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Trade-Offs of Chemotactic Foraging in Turbulent Water , 2012, Science.

[28]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[30]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Stochastic coordination of multiple actuators reduces latency and improves chemotactic response in bacteria , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Adaptation Dynamics in Densely Clustered Chemoreceptors , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[33]  B. Stecher,et al.  Flagella and Chemotaxis Are Required for Efficient Induction of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Colitis in Streptomycin-Pretreated Mice , 2004, Infection and Immunity.

[34]  Joachim Hermisson,et al.  Evolution of functional specialization and division of labor , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  张静,et al.  Banana Ovate family protein MaOFP1 and MADS-box protein MuMADS1 antagonistically regulated banana fruit ripening , 2015 .

[36]  Mingming Wu,et al.  Responses of Escherichia coli Bacteria to Two Opposing Chemoattractant Gradients Depend on the Chemoreceptor Ratio , 2010, Journal of bacteriology.

[37]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Fine-Tuning of Chemotactic Response in E. coli Determined by High-Throughput Capillary Assay , 2011, Current Microbiology.

[38]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.

[39]  Massimo Vergassola,et al.  Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Adam P. Arkin,et al.  Genetic Selection for Context-Dependent Stochastic Phenotypes: Sp1 and TATA Mutations Increase Phenotypic Noise in HIV-1 Gene Expression , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  B. Stecher,et al.  A Simple Screen to Identify Promoters Conferring High Levels of Phenotypic Noise , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[43]  Robert Mesibov,et al.  Chemotaxis Toward Amino Acids in Escherichia coli , 1972, Journal of bacteriology.

[44]  B. Perthame,et al.  Directional persistence of chemotactic bacteria in a traveling concentration wave , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Cellular Stoichiometry of the Components of the Chemotaxis Signaling Complex , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[47]  P. Sorger,et al.  Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis , 2009, Nature.

[48]  R. Stewart,et al.  CheZ Phosphatase Localizes to Chemoreceptor Patches via CheA-Short , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[49]  R. Macnab,et al.  Inversion of a behavioral response in bacterial chemotaxis: explanation at the molecular level. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Predicted Auxiliary Navigation Mechanism of Peritrichously Flagellated Chemotactic Bacteria , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  D. Dubnau,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression Determines Cell Fate in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Science.

[52]  Damon A. Clark,et al.  The bacterial chemotactic response reflects a compromise between transient and steady-state behavior. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Thierry Emonet,et al.  Limits of Feedback Control in Bacterial Chemotaxis , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Effect of phenotypic selection on stochastic gene expression. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[55]  G. Vinnicombe,et al.  Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations , 2010, Nature.

[56]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  Direct visualization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor arrays using cryo-electron microscopy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[58]  C. Studdert,et al.  A strain isolated from gas oil-contaminated soil displays chemotaxis towards gas oil and hexadecane. , 2003, Environmental microbiology.

[59]  V. Sourjik,et al.  Effects of receptor modification and temperature on dynamics of sensory complexes in Escherichia coli chemotaxis , 2011, BMC Microbiology.

[60]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  R. Levins.  THEORY OF FITNESS IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT. 3. THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[62]  Uri Alon,et al.  Response regulator output in bacterial chemotaxis , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[63]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Optimal Mixed Strategies in Stochastic Environments , 1995 .

[64]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Noise Management by Molecular Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[65]  Lili Jiang,et al.  Quantitative Modeling of Escherichia coli Chemotactic Motion in Environments Varying in Space and Time , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[66]  Mitchell,et al.  Microscale nutrient patches in planktonic habitats shown by chemotactic bacteria , 1998, Science.

[67]  J. Dobnikar,et al.  E. coli superdiffusion and chemotaxis-search strategy, precision, and motility. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[68]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[69]  Nikita Vladimirov,et al.  Role of Translational Coupling in Robustness of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway , 2009, PLoS biology.

[70]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  How white noise generates power-law switching in bacterial flagellar motors. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[72]  K. Ottemann,et al.  Chemotaxis Plays Multiple Roles during Helicobacter pylori Animal Infection , 2005, Infection and Immunity.

[73]  H. Berg,et al.  A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[74]  R. Levins.  Theory of Fitness in a Heterogeneous Environment. I. The Fitness Set and Adaptive Function , 1962, The American Naturalist.

[75]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Non-genetic heterogeneity from stochastic partitioning at cell division , 2011, Nature Genetics.