Prioritized assertional-based removed sets revision of DL-Lite belief bases

In real world applications, information is often provided by multiple sources having different priority levels reflecting for instance their reliability. This paper investigates ”Prioritized Removed Sets Revision” (PRSR) for revising stratified DL-Lite knowledge bases when a new sure piece of information, called the input, is added. The strategy of revision is based on inconsistency minimization and consists in determining smallest subsets of assertions (prioritized removed sets) that should be dropped from the current stratified knowledge base in order to restore consistency and accept the input. We consider different forms of input: A membership assertion, a positive or a negative inclusion axiom. To characterize our revision approach, we first rephrase Hansson’s postulates for belief bases revision within a DL-Lite setting, we then give logical properties of PRSR operators. In some situations, the revision process leads to several possible revised knowledge bases where defining a selection function is required to keep results within DL-Lite fragment. The last part of the paper shows how to use the notion of hitting set in order to compute the PRSR outcome. We also study the complexity of PRSR operators, and show that, in some cases, the computational complexity of the result can be performed in polynomial time.

[1]  Sven Ove Hansson Kernel Contraction , 1994, J. Symb. Log..

[2]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications , 2003, Description Logic Handbook.

[3]  Grigoris Antoniou,et al.  On Applying the AGM Theory to DLs and OWL , 2005, SEMWEB.

[4]  Maurizio Lenzerini,et al.  Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics for Description Logics , 2010, RR.

[5]  Julien Hué,et al.  Removed Sets Fusion: Performing Off The Shelf , 2008, ECAI.

[6]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Revision of Belief Sets and Belief Bases , 1998 .

[7]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[8]  Kewen Wang,et al.  A New Approach to Knowledge Base Revision in DL-Lite , 2010, AAAI.

[9]  Guilin Qi,et al.  Approximating Model-Based ABox Revision in DL-Lite: Theory and Practice , 2015, AAAI.

[10]  Kevin Lee,et al.  A Classification of Ontology Modification , 2004, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[11]  Yarden Katz,et al.  Belief Base Revision for Expressive Description Logics , 2006, OWLED.

[12]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Specified Meet Contraction , 2008 .

[13]  Odile Papini,et al.  A Prioritized Assertional-Based Revision for DL-Lite Knowledge Bases , 2014, JELIA.

[14]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Tractable Reasoning and Efficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The DL-Lite Family , 2007, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[15]  Russell Greiner,et al.  A Correction to the Algorithm in Reiter's Theory of Diagnosis , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Riccardo Rosati,et al.  New Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics for Robust Ontology-Based Data Access , 2013, Description Logics.

[17]  Grigoris Antoniou,et al.  On Generalizing the AGM Postulates , 2006, STAIRS.

[18]  Guilin Qi,et al.  Knowledge Base Revision in Description Logics , 2006, JELIA.

[19]  Meghyn Bienvenu,et al.  Inconsistency-Tolerant Conjunctive Query Answering for Simple Ontologies , 2012, Description Logics.

[20]  André Fuhrmann An Essay on Contraction , 1996 .

[21]  M. M. Ribeiro,et al.  Base Revision in Description Logics-Preliminary Results , 2007 .

[22]  Guilin Qi,et al.  Contraction and Revision over DL-Lite TBoxes , 2014, AAAI.

[23]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.

[24]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[25]  Salem Benferhat,et al.  How to Select One Preferred Assertional-Based Repair from Inconsistent and Prioritized DL-Lite Knowledge Bases? , 2015, IJCAI.

[26]  Zhisheng Huang,et al.  Conflict Resolution in Partially Ordered OWL DL Ontologies , 2014, ECAI.

[27]  Jeff Z. Pan,et al.  Inconsistencies, Negations and Changes in Ontologies , 2006, AAAI.

[28]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Evolution of DL-Lite Knowledge Bases , 2010, SEMWEB.

[29]  Johanna Völker,et al.  A Kernel Revision Operator for Terminologies - Algorithms and Evaluation , 2008, International Semantic Web Conference.

[30]  Grigoris Antoniou,et al.  Generalizing the AGM postulates: preliminary results and applications , 2004, NMR.

[31]  Guilin Qi,et al.  A Stratification-based Approach for Inconsistency Handling in Description Logics , 2007 .

[32]  Henri Prade,et al.  A Practical Approach to Revising Prioritized Knowledge Bases , 2002, Stud Logica.

[33]  Guilin Qi,et al.  A New Operator for ABox Revision in DL-Lite , 2012, AAAI.

[34]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Linking Data to Ontologies , 2008, J. Data Semant..

[35]  Franz Baader,et al.  Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their application in treating specificity in terminological default logic , 1995, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[36]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  A General Approach for Inconsistency Handling and Merging Information in Prioritized Knowledge Bases , 1998, KR.

[37]  André Fuhrmann,et al.  A survey of multiple contractions , 1994, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[38]  Henrik Legind Larsen,et al.  Detection of potential inconsistencies in knowledge bases , 1992, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[39]  Sven Ove Hansson Belief Revision: A dyadic representation of belief , 1992 .

[40]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[41]  Odile Papini A Complete Revision Function in Propositional Calculus , 1992, ECAI.

[42]  François Goasdoué,et al.  Querying Inconsistent Description Logic Knowledge Bases under Preferred Repair Semantics , 2014, Description Logics.

[43]  Guilin Qi,et al.  A Survey of Revision Approaches in Description Logics , 2008, Description Logics.

[44]  Bernhard Nebel,et al.  Base Revision Operations and Schemes: Semantics, Representation and Complexity , 1994, ECAI.

[45]  Guilin Qi,et al.  A revision-based approach to handling inconsistency in description logics , 2006, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[46]  Odile Papini,et al.  An answer set programming encoding of Prioritized Removed Sets Revision: application to GIS , 2008, Applied Intelligence.

[47]  Didier Dubois,et al.  How to Infer from Inconsisent Beliefs without Revising? , 1995, IJCAI.

[48]  Maurizio Lenzerini,et al.  On the Approximation of Instance Level Update and Erasure in Description Logics , 2007, AAAI.

[49]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  DL-Lite: Tractable Description Logics for Ontologies , 2005, AAAI.

[50]  Hirofumi Katsuno,et al.  Propositional Knowledge Base Revision and Minimal Change , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[51]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A Framework for Iterated Belief Revision Using Possibilistic Counterparts to Jeffrey's Rule , 2010, Fundam. Informaticae.

[52]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  Capturing model-based ontology evolution at the instance level: The case of DL-Lite , 2013, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[53]  Odile Papini,et al.  Assertional-based Prioritized Removed Sets Revision of DL-LiteR Knowledge Bases , 2014, ECAI.

[54]  Diego Calvanese,et al.  The DL-Lite Family and Relations , 2009, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[55]  Salem Benferhat,et al.  On the Revision of Prioritized DL-Lite Knowledge Bases , 2014, SUM.

[56]  Evgeny Kharlamov,et al.  Understanding Inexpressibility of Model-Based ABox Evolution in DL-Lite , 2011, AMW.

[57]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment , 1993, IJCAI.

[58]  Georg Gottlob,et al.  On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals , 1992, Artif. Intell..