Association of menstrual blood volume and reproductive outcomes in patients with caesarean scar pregnancy managed using uterine artery embolization and curettage

This study aimed to assess the association of menstrual blood volumes (MBV) and reproductive outcomes in patients after uterine artery embolization (UAE) combined with curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). This retrospective observational study enrolled women who underwent UAE plus curettage for CSP at the Interventional Department of Henan Provincial People's Hospital between December 2012 and December 2017. The primary outcome was pregnancy rate and the secondary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and interpregnancy interval. This study finally included 37 women (16 women with normal MBV and 21 women with decreased MBV) with pregnancy intention after UAE plus curettage for CSP. The pregnancy rate in women with normal MBV was higher than those with decreased MBV (81.3% vs. 47.6%; P = 0.048). There were no differences between the two groups regarding the interpregnancy interval (18.4 ± 8.7 vs. 22.2 ± 10.0 months, P = 0.233), and LBR (63% vs. 38%, P = 0.191). In conclusion, Women with normal MBV after UAE combined with curettage for CSP management might have a higher pregnancy rate compared with patients with decreased MBV, but there were no differences in LBR between the two groups.

[1]  Qi Chen,et al.  Subsequent Fertility in Women Treated for Caesarean Scar Pregnancy With Hysteroscopy: A 5-Year Follow-Up Descriptive Study in a Tertiary Hospital , 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology.

[2]  Huaijun Zhou,et al.  Surgical outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy: an 8-year experience at a single institution , 2021, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[3]  A. Edelman,et al.  Controversies in Family Planning: Management of Cesarean-Scar Ectopic Pregnancy. , 2020, Contraception.

[4]  V. Bérczi,et al.  Clinical outcome and analysis of procedural failure during uterine artery chemoembolisation as a treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy , 2020, Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques.

[5]  Y. Liu,et al.  Subsequent pregnancy outcomes and recurrence in women with previous Cesarean scar pregnancy: a 3‐year follow‐up study in a tertiary hospital , 2020, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  Q. Qu,et al.  Clinical assessment of uterine artery embolization combined with curettage when treating patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study of 169 cases , 2020, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[7]  J. Twisk,et al.  Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study , 2020, Human reproduction.

[8]  Lian Zhang,et al.  Outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in patients following treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided dilation and curettage , 2019, International Journal of Hyperthermia.

[9]  T. Bourne,et al.  Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study , 2018, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  Y. Tsushima,et al.  Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Dilation and Curettage for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: Efficacy and Future Fertility , 2018, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[11]  V. Parker,et al.  Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy , 2016, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[12]  D. Jurkovic,et al.  Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound‐guided suction curettage , 2016, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  E. Hoffmann,et al.  Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  Chunhai Li,et al.  Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy , 2011, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[15]  R. Simpson,et al.  Heterotopic pregnancy , 2011, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[16]  H. Yu,et al.  Uterine artery embolisation combined with local methotrexate for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy , 2010, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[17]  Yaling Zhuang,et al.  Uterine artery embolization compared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  E. Sawyer,et al.  Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[19]  M. Åkerlund Vascularization of Human Endometrium , 1994, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  E. Constance,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  Yue Wang,et al.  An Indwelling, Intrauterine Foley Balloon Catheter for Intraoperative and Postoperative Bleeding in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy. , 2019, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[22]  Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a committee opinion. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.