Structural Mechanics Based Model for the Force-Bearing Elements Within the Cytoskeleton of a Cell Adhered on a Bed of Posts

Mechanical forces play a vital role in the activities of cells and their interaction with biological and nonbiological material. Various experiments have successfully measured forces exerted by the cells when in contact with a substrate, but the intracellular contractile machinery leading to these actions is not entirely understood. Tan , (2003, “Cells Lying on a Bed of Microneedles: An Approach to Isolate Mechanical Force,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100 (4), pp. 1484–1489) use a bed of PDMS posts as the substrate for cells and measure the localized mechanical forces exerted by the cell cytoskeleton on the posts. In live cell experiments for this setup, post deflections are measured, and from these results the forces applied by the cell are calculated. From such results, it is desirable to quantify the contractile tensions generated in the force-bearing elements corresponding to the stress fibers within the cell cytoskeleton that generate the loads applied to the posts. The purpose of the present article is to consider the cytoskeleton as a discrete network of force-bearing elements, and present a structural mechanics based methodology to estimate the configuration of the network, and the contractile tension in the corresponding stress fibers. The network of stress fibers is modeled as a structure of truss elements connected among the posts adhered to a single cell. In-plane force equilibrium among the network of stress fibers and the system of posts is utilized to calculate the tension forces in the network elements. A Moore-Penrose pseudo-inverse is used to solve the linear equations obtained from the mechanical equilibrium of the cell-posts system, thereby obtaining a least squares fit of the stress fiber tensions to the post deflections. The predicted network of force-bearing elements provides an approximated distribution of the prominent stress fibers connected among deflected posts, and the tensions in each fibril.

[1]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Imaging the traction stresses exerted by locomoting cells with the elastic substratum method. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[2]  G. Strang.  Introduction to Linear Algebra , 1993 .

[3]  A. Evans,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of stress fiber organization in cells subject to cyclic stretch. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Carl D. Meyer,et al.  Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra , 2000 .

[5]  A. Evans,et al.  A model for the contractility of the cytoskeleton including the effects of stress-fibre formation and dissociation , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Amit Pathak.  Computational models for the bio-chemo-mechanical behavior of cells in diverse extra-cellular settings , 2008 .

[7]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[8]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[9]  E. Elson,et al.  Cellular mechanics as an indicator of cytoskeletal structure and function. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[10]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[11]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  A theoretical description of elastic pillar substrates in biophysical experiments. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[13]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Jcb: Article Introduction , 2002 .

[14]  E. Evans,et al.  Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  C F Dewey,et al.  Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[18]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[19]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[21]  D Stamenović,et al.  A microstructural approach to cytoskeletal mechanics based on tensegrity. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[23]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  K. Beningo,et al.  Nascent Focal Adhesions Are Responsible for the Generation of Strong Propulsive Forces in Migrating Fibroblasts , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  D. Ingber.  Tensegrity II. How structural networks influence cellular information processing networks , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[26]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Long-distance propagation of forces in a cell. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[28]  Amit Pathak,et al.  The simulation of stress fibre and focal adhesion development in cells on patterned substrates , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  Alexander A Spector,et al.  Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D. L. Taylor,et al.  Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata , 1997, Nature.

[31]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors Externally Applied Local Mechanical Force Induces Growth of Focal Contacts by an Mdia1-Dependent and Rock-Independent Mechanism , 2001 .

[32]  Y. Fung,et al.  Elementary mechanics of the endothelium of blood vessels. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  A bio-mechanical model for coupling cell contractility with focal adhesion formation , 2008 .

[35]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  D. Ingber.  Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.