Author ' s personal copy Psychophysical contrast calibration q

Electronic displays and computer systems offer numerous advantages for clinical vision testing. Laboratory and clinical measurements of various functions and in particular of (letter) contrast sensitivity require accurately calibrated display contrast. In the laboratory this is achieved using expensive light meters. We developed and evaluated a novel method that uses only psychophysical responses of a person with normal vision to calibrate the luminance contrast of displays for experimental and clinical applications. Our method combines psychophysical techniques (1) for detection (and thus elimination or reduction) of display saturating non-linearities; (2) for luminance (gamma function) estimation and linearization without use of a photometer; and (3) to measure without a photometer the luminance ratios of the display’s three color channels that are used in a bit-stealing procedure to expand the luminance resolution of the display. Using a photometer we verified that the calibration achieved with this procedure is accurate for both LCD and CRT displays enabling testing of letter contrast sensitivity to 0.5%. Our visual calibration procedure enables clinical, internet and home implementation and calibration verification of electronic contrast testing. 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  D. Pelli,et al.  Display Characterization , 1998 .

[2]  J. Faubert,et al.  Luminance contrast with clear and yellow‐tinted intraocular lenses , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  C W Tyler,et al.  Colour bit-stealing to enhance the luminance resolution of digital displays on a single pixel basis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  K. Thayaparan,et al.  Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  David H. Brainard,et al.  Calibration of a computer controlled color monitor , 1989 .

[6]  Bradley E. Dougherty,et al.  An Evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  G Dagnelie,et al.  Lutein improves visual function in some patients with retinal degeneration: a pilot study via the Internet. , 2000, Optometry.

[8]  Robert Ulichney,et al.  Dithering with blue noise , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  Yingmei Lavin,et al.  Visual experiment on the Web , 1999, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Jeffrey B. Mulligan,et al.  Presentation of calibrated images over the web , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Albert J. Ahumada,et al.  Principled halftoning based on human vision models , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Thomas A Carlson,et al.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[13]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Use of a Human Visual System Model to Predict Observer Performance with CRT vs LCD Display of Images , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  Jacobus Besuijen.  Visual gamma measurement and methods to compare gamma models , 2007 .

[15]  E. Peli,et al.  Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Elisa M. Colombo,et al.  Visual calibration of CRT monitors , 2001 .

[17]  Eli Peli,et al.  Electronic magnification and perceived contrast of video , 2012, Journal of the Society for Information Display.

[18]  Albert J. Ahumada,et al.  Lines and dipoles are efficiently detected , 2010 .

[19]  A. Arditi.  Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Khanh Nguyen,et al.  Use of a raster framebuffer in vision research , 1986 .

[21]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  Acuity, crowding, reading and fixation stability , 2007, Vision Research.

[22]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2010 .

[23]  T R Corwin,et al.  Contrast sensitivity norms for the Mentor B-VAT II-SG video acuity tester. , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance , 1983 .

[25]  D Swift,et al.  The use of VisionWorks in visual psychophysics research. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[26]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Effect of viewing angle on visual detection in liquid crystal displays , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  R. Rutstein,et al.  BVAT distance vs. near stereopsis screening of strabismus, strabismic amblyopia and refractive amblyopia; a prospective study of 68 patients. , 2000, Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly.

[28]  Eli Peli,et al.  Display nonlinearity in digital image processing for visual communications , 1991, Other Conferences.

[29]  J. Mulligan.  METHODS FOR SPATIOTEMPORAL DITHERING N , 1997 .

[30]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Generating high gray-level resolution monochrome displays with conventional computer graphics cards and color monitors , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  G. Dagnelie,et al.  Vision tests for the home PC: Test validation and results from a lutein supplementation trial , 2010 .

[32]  David L. Neuhoff,et al.  Least-squares model-based halftoning , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[33]  Eli Peli,et al.  Stereoacuity at Distance and Near , 2002, Optometry and Vision Science.

[34]  E. Peli,et al.  Lateral interactions: size does matter , 2002, Vision Research.

[35]  A comparative study of the efficiency of chart versus computer-generated contrast sensitivity testing in glaucoma patients and controls , 2009 .

[36]  Lawrence Huang,et al.  Similar perceptual costs for dividing attention between retina- and space-centered targets in humans. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[37]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[38]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[39]  E. Peli,et al.  Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve , 2010, Vision Research.