Representations of the pitch of complex tones in the auditory nerve

Previous studies of the coding of the pitch of complex tones in the auditory nerveand cochlear nucleus have documented a robust temporal representation based oninterspike interval distributions (Cariani and Delgutte, 1996; Rhode, 1995; Palmerand Winter, 1993). However, these studies have largely neglected possible rate-place cues to pitch available when individual harmonics are resolved by theperipheral auditory system. Stimuli used in these studies had fundamentalfrequencies in the range of human voice (100-300 Hz), which may produce few, ifany, resolved harmonics in typical experimental animals, which have a poorercochlear frequency selectivity compared to humans (Shera, Guinan and Oxenham,2002). Human psychophysical studies suggest that the low pitch produced bystimuli with resolved harmonics is stronger and less dependent on phaserelationships among the partials than the pitch based on unresolved harmonics(Shackleton and Carlyon, 1994).Here, we investigate the resolvability of harmonics of complex tones in the catauditory nerve, and compare the effectiveness of rate-place and interval-basedrepresentations of pitch over a much wider range of fundamental frequencies (110-3520 Hz) than in previous studies.

[1]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  Across-channel Masking of Changes in Modulation Depth for Amplitude- and Frequency-modulated Signals , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  R. Carlyon Comments on "A unitary model of pitch perception" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 1811-1820 (1997)]. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Miguel A. Merchʹan Mammalian Cochlear Nuclei : Organization and Function , 1993 .

[4]  I. Winter,et al.  CODING OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY OF VOICED SPEECH SOUNDS AND HARMONIC COMPLEXES IN THE COCHLEAR NERVE AND VENTRAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS. , 1993 .

[5]  M. Sachs,et al.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  I. Forsythe The Mammalian Cochlear Nuclei: Organization and Function. , 1994 .

[7]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Meddis,et al.  A unitary model of pitch perception. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  W. S. Rhode Interspike intervals as a correlate of periodicity pitch in cat cochlear nucleus. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  W A Yost,et al.  A time domain description for the pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J H Grose,et al.  Detection of frequency modulation (FM) in the presence of a second FM tone. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al.  Effects of relative frequency, absolute frequency, and phase on fundamental frequency discrimination: Data and an autocorrelation model , 2003 .

[17]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to AM and FM tones , 1983, Hearing Research.

[18]  W. Yost The dominance region and ripple noise pitch: a test of the peripheral weighting model. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  FM phase and the continuity illusion , 2002 .

[21]  S. Shamma Speech processing in the auditory system. I: The representation of speech sounds in the responses of the auditory nerve. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  S Shamma,et al.  The case of the missing pitch templates: how harmonic templates emerge in the early auditory system. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery , 1991 .

[24]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[25]  R. Carlyon,et al.  The role of resolved and unresolved harmonics in pitch perception and frequency modulation discrimination. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  R. Carlyon Detecting coherent and incoherent frequency modulation , 2000, Hearing Research.

[27]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  W. Yost Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.