Convolutional neural net face recognition works in non-human-like ways

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) give the state-of-the-art performance in many pattern recognition problems but can be fooled by carefully crafted patterns of noise. We report that CNN face recognition systems also make surprising ‘errors'. We tested six commercial face recognition CNNs and found that they outperform typical human participants on standard face-matching tasks. However, they also declare matches that humans would not, where one image from the pair has been transformed to appear a different sex or race. This is not due to poor performance; the best CNNs perform almost perfectly on the human face-matching tasks, but also declare the most matches for faces of a different apparent race or sex. Although differing on the salience of sex and race, humans and computer systems are not working in completely different ways. They tend to find the same pairs of images difficult, suggesting some agreement about the underlying similarity space.

[1]  G. Yovel,et al.  Critical features for face recognition , 2019, Cognition.

[2]  O. Lipp,et al.  The processing of invariant and variant face cues in the Garner Paradigm. , 2011, Emotion.

[3]  Christoph D. Dahl,et al.  Integration or separation in the processing of facial properties - a computational view , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Anna K Bobak,et al.  Facing the facts: Naive participants have only moderate insight into their face recognition and face perception abilities , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Connor J. Parde,et al.  Social Trait Information in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Trained for Face Identification , 2019, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Jason Yosinski,et al.  Deep neural networks are easily fooled: High confidence predictions for unrecognizable images , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[7]  A. Chrysochoos,et al.  Categorical perception of facial gender information: Behavioural evidence and the face-space metaphor , 2001 .

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Robust social categorization emerges from learning the identities of very few faces. , 2017, Psychological review.

[9]  A. Burton,et al.  Unfamiliar face matching: Pairs out-perform individuals and provide a route to training. , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[10]  Nicolas Davidenko,et al.  Attending to Race (or Gender) Does Not Increase Race (or Gender) Aftereffects , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Ramachandra Raghavendra,et al.  Robust transgender face recognition: Approach based on appearance and therapy factors , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA).

[12]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.

[13]  Patrick J. Grother,et al.  Face recognition vendor test part 3: , 2019 .

[14]  A. J. O'toole,et al.  Classifying faces by face and sex using an autoassociative memory trained for recognition , 1991 .

[15]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space , 1993 .

[16]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[17]  Carlos D. Castillo,et al.  An All-In-One Convolutional Neural Network for Face Analysis , 2016, 2017 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2017).

[18]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[19]  A. Burton,et al.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Zenghui Wang,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review , 2017, Neural Computation.

[21]  Shihui Han,et al.  Neural dynamics of racial categorization predicts racial bias in face recognition and altruism , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[22]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Soft Biometric Traits for Personal Recognition Systems , 2004, ICBA.

[23]  Matthew C Fysh,et al.  The Kent Face Matching Test , 2018, British journal of psychology.

[24]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.