Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results

Conclusions. Taking into account the excellent results with significant improvements in the speech tests and the very high satisfaction of the patients using the new strategy, this first implementation of a fine structure strategy could offer a new quality of hearing with cochlear implants (CIs). Objective. This study consisted of an intra-individual comparison of speech recognition, music perception and patient preference when subjects used two different speech coding strategies with a MedEl Pulsar CI: continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) and the new fine structure processing (FSP) strategy. In contrast to envelope-based strategies, the FSP strategy also delivers subtle pitch and timing differences of sound to the user and is thereby supposed to enhance speech perception in noise and increase the quality of music perception. Patients and methods. This was a prospective study assessing performance with two different speech coding strategies. The setting was a CI programme at an academic tertiary referral centre. Fourteen post-lingually deaf patients using a MedEl Pulsar CI with a mean CI experience of 0.98 years were supplied with the new FSP speech coding strategy. Subjects consecutively used the two different speech coding strategies. Speech and music tests were performed with the previously fitted CIS strategy, immediately after fitting with the new FSP strategy and 4, 8 and 12 weeks later. The main outcome measures were individual performance and subjective assessment of two different speech processors. Results. Speech and music test scores improved statistically significantly after conversion from CIS to FSP strategy. Twelve of 14 patients preferred the new FSP speech processing strategy over the CIS strategy.

[1]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[2]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing , 2002, Hearing Research.

[3]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W K Gstoettner,et al.  Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant. , 2000, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[5]  Wolfgang Gstoettner,et al.  Variables Affecting Speech Perception in Postlingually Deaf Adults Following Cochlear Implantation , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[6]  D. Hilbert Grundzuge Einer Allgemeinen Theorie Der Linearen Integralgleichungen , 2009 .

[7]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implants. Channel interactions and processor design. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[8]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Two New Directions in Speech Processor Design for Cochlear Implants , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[9]  B J Gantz,et al.  Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or nucleus cochlear implant. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[11]  Robert S Hong,et al.  Signal Coding in Cochlear Implants: Exploiting Stochastic Effects of Electrical Stimulation , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[12]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus). , 1996, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[13]  Christoph Arnoldner,et al.  Surgical considerations in cochlear implantation in children and adults: A review of 342 cases in Vienna , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  J. Knutson,et al.  The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. , 2003, Journal of music therapy.

[15]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.