Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles.

With contrast agents, ultrasound can make hemodynamic measurements in microvascular networks with the technique of disruption replenishment. In its current form, the method suffers from poor reproducibility and accuracy, largely due to the inappropriate use of a mono-exponential model for fitting the time replenishment data. In reality, the time-intensity replenishment curve reflects the hemodynamics and morphology of the vascular system being measured, the ultrasound field distribution and microbubble properties. Here, we introduce an analytic replenishment model that attempts to account for these parameters and compare its performance to the established model in a flow phantom. Specifically, the proposed model 1) incorporates the hemodynamic properties of the flow system (velocity distribution and vascular cross section), 2) includes the elevation and axial plane pressure distributions and 3) accounts for the distinct high and low MI disruption and detection boundaries. Compared to the currently accepted mono-exponential model, the presented model shows better agreement in both the quality of the fit and estimation of velocity (~5-10% vs. 20% error) for the same flow and acoustic conditions

[1]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Method for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion during myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1990, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  N. Jong,et al.  High Frequency Attenuation and Size Distribution Measurements of Definity and Manipulated Definity Populations , 2006 .

[3]  TheNetherlands Eindhoven Videodensitometric Methods for Cardiac Output Measurements , 2003 .

[4]  R. Cobbold Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound , 2006 .

[5]  S. Kaul Myocardial contrast echocardiography: 15 years of research and development. , 1997, Circulation.

[6]  Alexander Ehlgen,et al.  On the design of a capillary flow phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents at very low flow velocities. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  P. Allen,et al.  Lognormal Distributions , 1945, Nature.

[8]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Contrast ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery vasa vasorum and atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  S. Feinstein,et al.  The powerful microbubble: from bench to bedside, from intravascular indicator to therapeutic delivery system, and beyond. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[10]  E. G. Tickner,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Abnormalities with Contrast‐enhanced Two‐dimensional Echocardiography , 1982, Circulation.

[11]  P. Burns,et al.  Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis. , 2000, Radiology.

[12]  Xiaoping Zhou,et al.  A new formalism for the quantification of tissue perfusion by the destruction-replenishment method in contrast ultrasound imaging , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  J B Fowlkes,et al.  Analysis of refill curve shape in ultrasound contrast agent studies. , 2004, Medical physics.

[14]  H. Qian,et al.  A class of flow bifurcation models with lognormal distribution and fractal dispersion. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.

[16]  J G Miller,et al.  Contrast Echocardiography: Current and Future Applications , 2000 .

[17]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  A multivessel model describing replenishment kinetics of ultrasound contrast agent for quantification of tissue perfusion. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  T. Kim,et al.  Diagnosis of Focal Liver Masses on Ultrasonography , 2007, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[19]  Olivier Lucidarme,et al.  Blood flow quantification with contrast-enhanced US: "entrance in the section" phenomenon--phantom and rabbit study. , 2003, Radiology.

[20]  O. L. Kwan,et al.  In vivo correlation of thermodilution cardiac output and videodensitometric indicator-dilution curves obtained from contrast two-dimensional echocardiograms. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Norman C. Beaulieu,et al.  An optimal lognormal approximation to lognormal sum distributions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[22]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography During Left Atrial Injection of Contrast: Implications for Venous Injection , 1994, Circulation.

[23]  E. Halpern,et al.  Prostate cancer: contrast-enhanced us for detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[24]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Transit time kinetics in ordered and disordered vascular trees. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Blood Flow Assessment by Ultrasound‐Induced Destruction of Echocontrast Agents Using Harmonic Power Doppler Imaging: Which Parameters Determine Contrast Replenishment Curves? , 2001, Echocardiography.

[26]  K. Wei Assessment of Myocardial Blood Flow and Volume Using Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography , 2002, Echocardiography.