A novel approach for solving nonlinear flow equations: The next step towards an accurate assessment of shale gas resources

Abstract As ultra-tight porous media that include organic contents, shale gas resources are technically known as complex systems having various mechanisms that impact storage and flow. The slippage, Knudsen diffusion, the process of desorption, an adsorbed layer that affects apparent permeability, and solute gas in kerogen are recognized to be the most important ones. However, simultaneous effects of multi-mechanism flow and storage, and influences of scattered organic contents on shale gas flow behaviour are not well-understood yet. According to the mass conservation law, a basic mathematical model has been developed to investigate, step-by-step, the effects of different changes that are introduced, and examine whether patterns of how kerogen is distributed affect the production plateaus. The discretization of the second-order nonlinear Partial Differential Equation (PDE) that is evolved results in a certain number of nonlinear simultaneous algebraic equations, which are conventionally solved with the application of Newton’s method. To overcome the inherent difficulties of the initial guess, the derivations, and the inversion of the Jacobian matrix, a new application of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) as a nonlinear solver was applied to extract the anticipated pressure profile for each step in time outside the bounds of the reference equations. The results show that not only can the PSO effectively meet the required criteria, but also it performed faster than conventional techniques, especially in cases with a larger number of grids that encompass more phenomena. It was further revealed that the insertion of a multi-mechanism apparent permeability model in which the pore radius is also a pressure-dependent parameter causes the lower rate of production. A higher level of production has been recorded after including storage terms of adsorption and solute gas in kerogens. Although different patterns of kerogen distribution have finally overlapped, the different taken trend of each production profile underlines the impact of kerogen distribution as an important parameter within the procedure of history matching.

[1]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs , 2009 .

[2]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  A novel pressure transient response model considering multiple migration mechanisms in shale gas reservoir , 2015 .

[3]  Sohrab Zendehboudi,et al.  Evolving simple-to-use method to determine water–oil relative permeability in petroleum reservoirs , 2016 .

[4]  George J. Moridis,et al.  A Numerical Study of Microscale Flow Behavior in Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoir Systems , 2011 .

[5]  Guojin Tang,et al.  Hybrid approach for solving systems of nonlinear equations using chaos optimization and quasi-Newton method , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Frank Male,et al.  Gas production in the Barnett Shale obeys a simple scaling theory , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Measurement of gas storage processes in shale and of the molecular diffusion coefficient in kerogen , 2014 .

[8]  James G. Speight,et al.  Shale Gas Production Processes , 2007 .

[9]  Ebrahim Fathi,et al.  Matrix Heterogeneity Effects on Gas Transport and Adsorption in Coalbed and Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2009 .

[10]  Watheq J. Al-Mudhafar,et al.  Metamodeling via Hybridized Particle Swarm with Polynomial and Splines Regression for Optimization of CO2-EOR in Unconventional Oil Reservoirs , 2017 .

[11]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Why shale permeability changes under variable effective stresses: New insights , 2018 .

[12]  Abbas Firoozabadi,et al.  Phase Behavior and Flow in Shale Nanopores From Molecular Simulations , 2015 .

[13]  J. Hagoort Fundamentals of gas reservoir engineering , 1988 .

[14]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  Adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide on gas shale and pure mineral samples , 2014 .

[15]  Mohammad Kazemi,et al.  An analytical model for shale gas permeability , 2015 .

[16]  A. Settari,et al.  A Numerical Model for Multi-mechanism flow in Shale Gas Reservoirs with Application to Laboratory Scale Testing , 2013 .

[17]  F. Javadpour,et al.  Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments , 2007 .

[18]  Stephen A. Holditch,et al.  Unconventional oil and gas resource development – Let’s do it right , 2013 .

[19]  M. Jamiolahmady,et al.  Slip flow in porous media , 2016 .

[20]  Jun Yao,et al.  Apparent gas permeability in an organic-rich shale reservoir , 2016 .

[21]  Abbas Firoozabadi,et al.  Thermodynamic Modeling of Phase Behavior in Shale Media , 2016 .

[22]  John Killough,et al.  Beyond dual-porosity modeling for the simulation of complex flow mechanisms in shale reservoirs , 2013, Computational Geosciences.

[23]  Karsten Pruess,et al.  Gas Flow in Porous Media With Klinkenberg Effects , 1996 .

[24]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Modeling Gas Adsorption in Marcellus Shale With Langmuir and BET Isotherms , 2016 .

[25]  M. Ahmadi Neural network based unified particle swarm optimization for prediction of asphaltene precipitation , 2012 .

[26]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Simulation of gas desorption and geomechanics effects for unconventional gas reservoirs , 2014 .

[27]  M. Meyyappan,et al.  Modeling gas flow through microchannels and nanopores , 2003 .

[28]  K. Sepehrnoori,et al.  Development of a semi-analytical model for simulation of gas production in shale gas reservoirs , 2014 .

[29]  Roberto Aguilera,et al.  Knudsen’s Permeability Correction for Tight Porous Media , 2011, Transport in Porous Media.

[30]  Carl H. Sondergeld,et al.  Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part I: New Pore-Scale Considerations , 2012 .

[31]  Mingzhen Wei,et al.  Study on Gas Flow through Nano Pores of Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2015 .

[32]  Mohammad Ali Ahmadi,et al.  Robust intelligent tool for estimating dew point pressure in retrograded condensate gas reservoirs: Application of particle swarm optimization , 2014 .

[33]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Experimental study and modelling of methane adsorption and diffusion in shale , 2014 .

[34]  J. Faires,et al.  Numerical Methods , 2002 .

[35]  Hanqiao Jiang,et al.  The impact of diffusion type on multiscale discrete fracture model numerical simulation for shale gas , 2014 .

[36]  W. Svrcek,et al.  Gas Solubility, Viscosity And Density Measurements For Athabasca Bitumen , 1982 .

[37]  HanYi Wang,et al.  Impact of Shale-Gas Apparent Permeability on Production: Combined Effects of Non-Darcy Flow/Gas-Slippage, Desorption, and Geomechanics , 2015 .

[38]  Amin Shokrollahi,et al.  Evolving artificial neural network and imperialist competitive algorithm for prediction oil flow rate of the reservoir , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[39]  Qin Wang,et al.  Conjugate direction particle swarm optimization solving systems of nonlinear equations , 2009, Comput. Math. Appl..

[40]  Antonin Settari,et al.  A Pore Scale Gas Flow Model for Shale Gas Reservoir , 2012 .

[41]  K. H. Hashmy,et al.  Log-Based Identification of Sweet Spots for Effective Fracs in Shale Reservoirs , 2011 .

[42]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Klinkenberg effect on predicting and measuring helium permeability in gas shales , 2014 .

[43]  Steven L. Bryant,et al.  Gas Permeability of Shale , 2012 .

[44]  R. M. Bustin,et al.  Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications , 2009 .

[45]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[46]  Kevin M. Passino,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization , 2011 .

[47]  F. Javadpour Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone) , 2009 .

[48]  P. Zitha,et al.  A diffusion–viscous flow model for simulating shale gas transport in nano-pores , 2016 .

[49]  Charles L. Karr,et al.  Solutions to systems of nonlinear equations via a genetic algorithm , 1998 .

[50]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Langmuir slip-Langmuir sorption permeability model of shale , 2016 .

[51]  I. Akkutlu,et al.  Permeability of Organic-Rich Shale , 2014 .

[52]  I. Akkutlu,et al.  Multiscale Gas Transport in Shales With Local Kerogen Heterogeneities , 2012 .

[53]  I. Akkutlu,et al.  Correction to Klinkenberg slip theory for gas flow in nano-capillaries , 2012 .

[54]  H. Darabi,et al.  Nonempirical apparent permeability of shale , 2013 .

[55]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  REPORT: A MODEL FOR FLOWS IN CHANNELS, PIPES, AND DUCTS AT MICRO AND NANO SCALES , 1999 .

[56]  Quinn R. Passey,et al.  From Oil-Prone Source Rock to Gas-Producing Shale Reservoir - Geologic and Petrophysical Characterization of Unconventional Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2010 .

[57]  Xiao Guo,et al.  Modeling transient pressure behavior of a fractured well for shale gas reservoirs based on the properties of nanopores , 2015 .

[58]  Dmitriy Silin,et al.  Shale Gas: Nanometer-Scale Observations and Well Modelling , 2012 .

[59]  S. Imtiaz,et al.  Nonlinearity and solution techniques in reservoir simulation: A review , 2017 .

[60]  Muhammad Aslam Noor,et al.  Some iterative methods for solving a system of nonlinear equations , 2009, Comput. Math. Appl..

[61]  Ebrahim Fathi,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Storage Capacity of Organic-Rich Shales , 2011 .

[62]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Model for Surface Diffusion of Adsorbed Gas in Nanopores of Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2015 .

[63]  Esmaile Khorram,et al.  Particle swarm algorithm for solving systems of nonlinear equations , 2011, Comput. Math. Appl..

[64]  M. E. Naraghi,et al.  Slip-corrected liquid permeability and its effect on hydraulic fracturing and fluid loss in shale , 2015 .