Development by Design: Mitigating Wind Development's Impacts on Wildlife in Kansas

Wind energy, if improperly sited, can impact wildlife through direct mortality and habitat loss and fragmentation, in contrast to its environmental benefits in the areas of greenhouse gas, air quality, and water quality. Fortunately, risks to wildlife from wind energy may be alleviated through proper siting and mitigation offsets. Here we identify areas in Kansas where wind development is incompatible with conservation, areas where wind development may proceed but with compensatory mitigation for impacts, and areas where development could proceed without the need for compensatory mitigation. We demonstrate that approximately 10.3 million ha in Kansas (48 percent of the state) has the potential to provide 478 GW of installed capacity while still meeting conservation goals. Of this total, approximately 2.7 million ha would require no compensatory mitigation and could produce up to 125 GW of installed capacity. This is 1,648 percent higher than the level of wind development needed in Kansas by 2030 if the United States is to get 20 percent of its electricity from wind. Projects that avoid and offset impacts consistent with this analysis could be awarded “Green Certification.” Certification may help to expand and sustain the wind industry by facilitating the completion of individual projects sited to avoid sensitive areas and protecting the industry's reputation as an ecologically friendly source of electricity.

[1]  Wallace P. Erickson,et al.  Patterns of Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities in North America , 2008 .

[2]  Erik Lundtang Petersen,et al.  Environmental impacts of wind-energy projects , 2007 .

[3]  A L Gardner,et al.  National biological service. , 1995, Science.

[4]  T. Loughin,et al.  LOCATION AND SUCCESS OF LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN NESTS IN RELATION TO VEGETATION AND HUMAN DISTURBANCE , 2005 .

[5]  A. Peterson,et al.  Major Negative Impacts of Early Intensive Cattle Stocking on Tallgrass Prairies: The Case of the Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido) , 2002 .

[6]  Sharon K. Collinge,et al.  Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning , 1996 .

[7]  Lance B. McNew.  An analysis of greater prairie-chicken demography in Kansas: the effects of human land use on the population ecology of an obligate grassland species , 2010 .

[8]  W. Jensen,et al.  Trends in Abundance of Hibernating Bats in a Karst Region of the Southern Great Plains , 2010 .

[9]  Paul M. Cryan,et al.  Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions , 2009 .

[10]  J. Fargione,et al.  Energy Sprawl or Energy Efficiency: Climate Policy Impacts on Natural Habitat for the United States of America , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  D. Naugle,et al.  Energy Development and Greater Sage-Grouse , 2013 .

[12]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation , 1996, Restoration & Management Notes.

[13]  A. Pullin,et al.  Poor evidence-base for assessment of windfarm impacts on birds , 2007, Environmental Conservation.

[14]  A. Clevenger,et al.  The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. , 2005 .

[15]  Amy Pocewicz,et al.  Mapping Oil and Gas Development Potential in the US Intermountain West and Estimating Impacts to Species , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  B. E. Jamison,et al.  Guidelines for managing lesser prairie‐chicken populations and their habitats , 2004, Wildlife Society bulletin.

[17]  C. Braun.  Oil and Gas Development in Western North America : Effects on Sagebrush Steppe Avifauna with Particular Emphasis on Sage-grouse , 2002 .

[18]  C. Frissell,et al.  Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities , 2000 .

[19]  Michael R. Schirmacher,et al.  Altering turbine speed reduces bat mortality at wind‐energy facilities , 2011 .

[20]  C. P. Lo,et al.  Applied Remote Sensing , 1988 .

[21]  Thomas H. Kunz,et al.  Behavioral Responses of Bats to Operating Wind Turbines , 2008 .

[22]  S. Skagen,et al.  Residency patterns of migrating sandpipers at a midcontinental stopover , 1994 .

[23]  Erin F. Baerwald,et al.  A Large-Scale Mitigation Experiment to Reduce Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities , 2009 .

[24]  S. Skagen,et al.  Reducing sedimentation of depressional wetlands in agricultural landscapes , 2008, Wetlands.

[25]  H. Chapman,et al.  Back from the brink. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[26]  Erin F. Baerwald,et al.  Barotrauma is a significant cause of bat fatalities at wind turbines , 2008, Current Biology.

[27]  Amy Pocewicz,et al.  Frontiers inEcology and the Environment Development by design : blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy , 2009 .

[28]  R. Didham,et al.  Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[29]  J. Wickham,et al.  Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States , 2007 .

[30]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[31]  Amy Pocewicz,et al.  A Framework for Implementing Biodiversity Offsets: Selecting Sites and Determining Scale , 2009 .

[32]  M. Boyce,et al.  Energy development and wildlife conservation in western North America , 2011 .

[33]  Debra K. Meyer,et al.  Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992–2001 Land Cover Change Retrofit product , 2009 .

[34]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .

[35]  M. Patten,et al.  It's Not Easy Being Green: Wind Energy and a Declining Grassland Bird , 2009 .

[36]  M. Patten,et al.  Avoidance Behavior by Prairie Grouse: Implications for Development of Wind Energy , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[37]  C. Dytham,et al.  Genetic diversity in butterflies: interactive effects of habitat fragmentation and climate-driven range expansion , 2006, Biology Letters.

[38]  M. Ryan,et al.  Predicting Greater Prairie-Chicken Nest Success from Vegetation and Landscape Characteristics , 1998 .

[39]  Thomas H. Kunz,et al.  Win-Win for Wind and Wildlife: A Vision to Facilitate Sustainable Development , 2011, PloS one.

[40]  Max Nielsen-Pincus,et al.  Predicting land use change: comparison of models based on landowner surveys and historical land cover trends , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  A. Pocewicz,et al.  Energy by Design: Making Mitigation Work for Conservation and Development , 2011 .

[42]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks , 2010, Environmental management.

[43]  M. Dale Strickland,et al.  Ecological Impacts of Wind Energy Development on Bats: Questions, Research Needs, and Hypotheses , 2007 .

[44]  L. Hubert‐Moy.  Ramsar Convention on Wetlands , 2005 .

[45]  A. Pocewicz,et al.  Energy Development and Conservation Tradeoffs: Systematic Planning for Greater Sage-Grouse in their Eastern Range , 2011 .

[46]  A. F. Powell,et al.  Responses of breeding birds in tallgrass prairie to fire and cattle grazing , 2008 .

[47]  F. Samson,et al.  Prairie conservation: preserving North America's most endangered ecosystem. , 1997 .