Modeling Reputational and Informational Influences in Threshold Models of Bandwagon Innovation Diffusion

Bandwagon innovation diffusion is characterized by a positive feedback loop where adoptions by some actors increase the pressure to adopt for other actors. In particular, when gains from an innovation are difficult to quantify, such as implementing quality circles or downsizing practices, diffusion is likely to occur through a bandwagon process. In this paper we extend Abrahamson and Rosenkopf&2018;s (1993) model of bandwagon diffusion to examine both reputational and informational influences on this process. We find that the distribution of reputations among the set of potential adopters affects the extent of bandwagon diffusion under conditions of moderate ambiguity, and we find that bandwagons occur even when potential adopters receive information about others&2018; unprofitable experiences with the innovation.

[1]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Diffusion of new products in risk-sensitive markets , 1988 .

[2]  H. Quirmbach.  The diffusion of new technology and the market for an innovation , 1986 .

[3]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences , 1994 .

[4]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[5]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[6]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach , 1981 .

[7]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Intra-Firm Diffusion, Bayesian Learning and Profitability , 1981 .

[8]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[9]  Frances J. Milliken.  Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[10]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  The differential impact of social integration on participation in the diffusion of innovations , 1973 .

[11]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  Innovation and Organizations. , 1974 .

[12]  D. Teece,et al.  Organizational Structure and Economic Performance: A Test of the Multidivisional Hypothesis , 1978 .

[13]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[14]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  The Coevolution of Community Networks and Technology: Lessons from the Flight Simulation Industry , 1998 .

[15]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[16]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[17]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[18]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. , 1992 .

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[20]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[21]  R. Rumelt.  Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[22]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[23]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  War and Peace: The Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in U.S. Industry , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  WHEN DO BANDWAGON DIFFUSIONS ROLL? HOW FAR DO THEY GO? AND WHEN DO THEY ROLL BACKWARDS?: A COMPUTER SIMULATION. , 1990 .

[25]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[26]  G. O'Mara,et al.  Farm size and the diffusion of green revolution technology ; On information and innovation diffusion : a bayesian approach , 1982 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Communication at a Distance: The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change. , 1994 .

[28]  Howard E. Aldrich.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[29]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  Herd Behavior and Investment , 1990 .

[30]  G. Davis.  Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network , 1991 .

[31]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS: USING MATHEMATICAL MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION , 1993 .

[34]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Status , 1996 .

[35]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[36]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Learning-by-Doing and Market Performance , 1983 .

[37]  R. Burt.  Innovation as a structural interest: rethinking the impact of network position on innovation adoption , 1980 .

[38]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach , 1990 .

[39]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[40]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Limits to Bureaucratic Growth. , 1985 .

[41]  Kathleen M. Carley.  A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .

[42]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[43]  Eric Abrahamson.  Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[44]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[45]  S. Davies.  The Diffusion of Process Innovations , 1979 .

[46]  Thomas W. Valente.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[47]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[48]  J. Pennings,et al.  The diffusion of technological innovation in the commercial banking industry , 1992 .

[49]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Communication Technologies and their Effect on Cultural Homogeneity, Consensus, and the Diffusion of New Ideas , 1995 .

[50]  M. Becker,et al.  Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model , 1970 .

[51]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[52]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test , 1989 .

[53]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[54]  D. Torres.  Limits to Bureaucratic Growth.By Marshall W. Meyer, with William Stevenson and Stephen Webster, de Gruyter. 228 pp. $29.95 , 1988 .

[55]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[56]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[57]  T. Valente,et al.  Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1995, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[58]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[59]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[60]  E. Mansfield.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[61]  D. Krackhardt.  Organizational viscosity and the diffusion of controversial innovations , 1997 .

[62]  B. Latané.  Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by Communication. , 1996 .