Frequency decomposition techniques for increased discriminative 3D facial information capture

Eigen-based techniques and other monolithic approaches to face recognition have long been a cornerstone in the face recognition community due to the high dimensionality of face images. Eigen-face techniques provide minimal reconstruction error and limit high-frequency content while linear discriminant-based techniques (fisher-faces) allow the construction of subspaces which preserve discriminatory information. This paper presents a frequency decomposition approach for improved face recognition performance utilising three well-known techniques: Wavelets; Gabor / Log-Gabor; and the Discrete Cosine Transform. Experimentation illustrates that frequency domain partitioning prior to dimensionality reduction increases the information available for classification and greatly increases face recognition performance for both eigen-face and fisher-face approaches.

[1]  Biing-Hwang Juang,et al.  Fundamentals of speech recognition , 1993, Prentice Hall signal processing series.

[2]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  Face recognition through mismatch driven representations of the face , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Visual Surveillance and Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance.

[3]  Vinod Chandran,et al.  3D Face Recognition using Log-Gabor Templates , 2006, BMVC.

[4]  J. Daugman Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles , 1980, Vision Research.

[5]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[6]  Marc Parizeau,et al.  Experiments on eigenfaces robustness , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[7]  Jen-Tzung Chien,et al.  Discriminant Waveletfaces and Nearest Feature Classifiers for Face Recognition , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  The CSU Face Identification Evaluation System: Its Purpose, Features, and Structure , 2003, ICVS.

[9]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Face recognition: A literature survey , 2003, CSUR.

[10]  John G. Daugman,et al.  Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[11]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  PCA versus LDA , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Kuldip K. Paliwal,et al.  Fast features for face authentication under illumination direction changes , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Face Recognition Using 2D and 3D Facial Data , 2003 .

[14]  Peter Johansen,et al.  Gaussian Scale-Space Theory , 1997, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[15]  I. Craw,et al.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  Recognizing faces with PCA and ICA , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[17]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.