Sequential search by groups with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental study

In many sequential search situations, decisions are reached by groups. We examine behavior in such situations experimentally using an extension of the “secretary problem”. In our setup, group members (players) with non-aligned preferences inspect alternatives or “applicants” one at a time with no backward solicitation. A minimal information structure is assumed where players are only informed of the relative ranks of the alternatives as they inspect them sequentially. We present the equilibrium solution, and then use it as a benchmark for our analysis. We report the results from a controlled experiment showing that subjects over-searched relative to equilibrium. Decisions were affected by theoretically irrelevant observations including the relative rank of the previous alternative and the other player’s relative rank of the current alternative. For managers engaged in committee sequential search tasks, our findings highlight the importance of being aware to reach compromises early on, among other implications.

[1]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence , 1966 .

[2]  Masami Yasuda,et al.  MULTI-VARIATE STOPPING PROBLEM WITH A MAJORITY RULE , 1980 .

[3]  D. Schunk Behavioral heterogeneity in dynamic search situations: Theory and experimental evidence , 2009 .

[4]  C. Engel How Much Collusion? A Meta-Analysis on Oligopoly Experiments , 2006 .

[5]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  Theory and Experiment: What are the questions? , 2009 .

[6]  S. M. Samuels,et al.  Optimal selection based on relative rank (the “secretary problem”) , 1964 .

[7]  Saoussen Krichen,et al.  Optimal stopping problems by two or more decision makers: a survey , 2007, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[8]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Democracy Under Uncertainty: The ‘Wisdom of Crowds’ and the Free-Rider Problem in Group Decision Making , 2010, Psychological review.

[9]  Drazen Prelec,et al.  Preferences for sequences of outcomes. , 1993 .

[10]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Competitive dynamic pricing with alternating offers: Theory and experiment , 2012, Games Econ. Behav..

[12]  Darryl A. Seale,et al.  Optimal stopping behavior with relative ranks: the secretary problem with unknown population size , 2000 .

[13]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  Sequential Observation and Selection with Rank-Dependent Payoffs: An Experimental Study , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Alison King Chung Lo,et al.  Consumer Sequential Search: Not Enough or Too Much? , 2003 .

[15]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Consumer Search: Not Enough or Too Much? , 2001 .

[16]  P. Freeman The Secretary Problem and its Extensions: A Review , 1983 .

[17]  Charles Lewis,et al.  Partial Omega Squared for Anova Designs , 1979 .

[18]  Amos Tversky,et al.  Endowment and contrast in judgments of well-being. , 1991 .

[19]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Dynamic aspects of voluntary turnover: an integrated approach to curvilinearity in the performance-turnover relationship. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Analysis of heuristic solutions to the best choice problem , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  J. Neil Bearden,et al.  Multi-attribute sequential search , 2007 .

[22]  J. Elster,et al.  Utility from memory and anticipation. , 1992 .

[23]  James Albrecht,et al.  Search by Committee , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[24]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. , 2005, Psychological review.

[25]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations , 2002 .

[26]  Masami Yasuda,et al.  MULTI-VARIATE STOPPING PROBLEMS WITH A MONOTONE RULE , 1982 .

[27]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Cost and accessibility of offers as determinants of optional stopping , 1966 .

[28]  Thomas S. Ferguson,et al.  Who Solved the Secretary Problem , 1989 .

[29]  David Lindley,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Decision Theory , 1961 .

[30]  An Experimental Test of a Committee Search Model , 2013 .

[31]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Operations Research in Experimental Psychology , 2005 .

[32]  Minoru Sakaguchi,et al.  A non-zero-sum no-information best-choice game , 2004, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[33]  M. Degroot Optimal Statistical Decisions , 1970 .

[34]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  Darryl A. Seale,et al.  Sequential Decision Making with Relative Ranks: An Experimental Investigation of the "Secretary Problem"> , 1997 .

[36]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Detecting Failures of Backward Induction: Monitoring Information Search in Sequential Bargaining , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[37]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Effects of Financial Incentives on the Breakdown of Mutual Trust , 2002, Psychological science.

[38]  A. Roth,et al.  An experimental study of sequential bargaining , 1998 .

[39]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  A multi-attribute extension of the secretary problem: Theory and experiments , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[40]  Ken Binmore,et al.  A Backward Induction Experiment , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.