A fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic swelling model for articular cartilage.

From a mechanical point of view, the most relevant components of articular cartilage are the tight and highly organized collagen network together with the charged proteoglycans. Due to the fixed charges of the proteoglycans, the cation concentration inside the tissue is higher than in the surrounding synovial fluid. This excess of ion particles leads to an osmotic pressure difference, which causes swelling of the tissue. The fibrillar collagen network resists straining and swelling pressures. This combination makes cartilage a unique, highly hydrated and pressurized tissue, enforced with a strained collagen network. Many theories to explain articular cartilage behavior under loading, expressed in computational models that either include the swelling behavior or the properties of the anisotropic collagen structure, can be found in the literature. The most common tests used to determine the mechanical quality of articular cartilage are those of confined compression, unconfined compression, indentation and swelling. All theories currently available in the literature can explain the cartilage response occurring in some of the above tests, but none of them can explain these for all of the tests. We hypothesized that a model including simultaneous mathematical descriptions of (1) the swelling properties due to the fixed-change densities of the proteoglycans and (2) the anisotropic viscoelastic collagen structure, can explain all these test simultaneously. To study this hypothesis we extended our fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic finite element model with our biphasic swelling model. We have shown that the newly developed fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic swelling (FPVES) model for articular cartilage can simultaneously account for the reaction force during swelling, confined compression, indentation and unconfined compression as well as the lateral deformation during unconfined compression. Using this theory it is possible to analyze the link between the collagen network and the swelling properties of articular cartilage.

[1]  Van C. Mow,et al.  Structure and function of articular cartilage and meniscus , 2005 .

[2]  J M Huyghe,et al.  A comparison between mechano-electrochemical and biphasic swelling theories for soft hydrated tissues. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  W M Lai,et al.  A triphasic theory for the swelling and deformation behaviors of articular cartilage. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  J. M. Huyghe,et al.  An ionised/non-ionised dual porosity model of intervertebral disc tissue , 2003, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[5]  JD Jan Janssen,et al.  A validation of the quadriphasic mixture theory for intervertebral disc tissue , 1997 .

[6]  W M Lai,et al.  Effects of nonlinear strain-dependent permeability and rate of compression on the stress behavior of articular cartilage. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  R. Schneiderman,et al.  Depth-dependent compressive properties of normal aged human femoral head articular cartilage: relationship to fixed charge density. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[8]  John M. Clark,et al.  Variation of collagen fiber alignment in a joint surface: A scanning electron microscope study of the tibial plateau in dog, rabbit, and man , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  W Herzog,et al.  Strain-rate dependence of cartilage stiffness in unconfined compression: the role of fibril reinforcement versus tissue volume change in fluid pressurization. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Kam W. Leong,et al.  A Nonlinear Hyperelastic Mixture Theory Model for Anisotropy, Transport, and Swelling of Annulus Fibrosus , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Sheldon R. Simon,et al.  Orthopaedic basic science : biology and biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system , 2000 .

[12]  Jd Jan Janssen,et al.  Quadriphasic mechanics of swelling incompressible porous media , 1997 .

[13]  Wilson C. Hayes,et al.  Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics , 1995 .

[14]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  A fibril reinforced nonhomogeneous poroelastic model for articular cartilage: inhomogeneous response in unconfined compression. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Swelling pressures of proteoglycans at the concentrations found in cartilaginous tissues. , 1979, Biorheology.

[16]  J. Clark,et al.  The organization of collagen in cryofractured rabbit articular cartilage: A scanning electron microscopic study , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  J. Suh,et al.  A cross-validation of the biphasic poroviscoelastic model of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, indentation, and confined compression. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Swelling of articular cartilage and other connective tissues: Electromechanochemical forces , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  D Stamenović,et al.  Confined and unconfined stress relaxation of cartilage: appropriateness of a transversely isotropic analysis. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Experimental verification of the roles of intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and tension-compression nonlinearity in the biphasic response of cartilage. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  V. Mow,et al.  A MIXED FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION OF TRIPHASIC MECHANO-ELECTROCHEMICAL THEORY FOR CHARGED, HYDRATED BIOLOGICAL SOFT TISSUES , 1999 .

[23]  W Herzog,et al.  Articular cartilage biomechanics: theoretical models, material properties, and biosynthetic response. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[24]  Fpt Frank Baaijens,et al.  3D FE implementation of an incompressible quadriphasic mixture model , 2003 .

[25]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Physicochemical properties of cartilage in the light of ion exchange theory. , 1968, Biophysical journal.

[26]  A. Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Alterations in Mechanical Behaviour of Articular Cartilage due to Changes in Depth Varying Material Properties--a Nonhomogeneous Poroelastic Model Study , 2002, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[27]  Y Lanir,et al.  Biorheology and fluid flux in swelling tissues. I. Bicomponent theory for small deformations, including concentration effects. , 1987, Biorheology.

[28]  P J Prendergast,et al.  A Comparison of Finite Element Codes for the Solution of Biphasic Poroelastic Problems , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[29]  A. Benninghoff,et al.  Form und Bau der Gelenkknorpel in ihren Beziehungen zur Funktion , 2004, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[30]  Albert C. Chen,et al.  Depth‐dependent confined compression modulus of full‐thickness bovine articular cartilage , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  R Huiskes,et al.  Stresses in the local collagen network of articular cartilage: a poroviscoelastic fibril-reinforced finite element study. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[33]  A F Mak,et al.  The apparent viscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage--the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and interstitial fluid flows. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  M J Glimcher,et al.  In vitro wear of articular cartilage. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.