Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: An empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable☆

[1]  Kweku Ewusi-Mensah,et al.  The external organizational environment and its impact on management information systems , 1981 .

[2]  D. Otley.  The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis , 1980 .

[3]  Janine Nahapiet,et al.  Towards a framework for the study of the antecedents and consequences of information systems in organizations , 1979 .

[4]  Shahid L. Ansari,et al.  Towards an open systems approach to budgeting , 1979 .

[5]  R. Daft,et al.  A New Approach to Design and Use of Management Information , 1978, California management review.

[6]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[7]  D. Otley.  BUDGET USE AND MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE , 1978 .

[8]  A. Hopwood.  Towards an organizational perspective for the study of accounting and information systems , 1978 .

[9]  V. Sathe.  The relevance of modern organization theory for managerial accounting , 1978 .

[10]  Francis D. Tuggle,et al.  Strategic decision processes and the design of accounting information systems: Conceptual linkages , 1978 .

[11]  John H. Waterhouse,et al.  A contingency framework for management accounting systems research , 1978 .

[12]  Michael Keeley,et al.  Subjective Performance Evaluation And Person-Role Conflict Under Conditions Of Uncertainty , 1977 .

[13]  W. Ouchi.  The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control. , 1977 .

[14]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[15]  Shahid L. Ansari,et al.  An integrated approach to control system design , 1977 .

[16]  John Dearden,et al.  Management control systems : text and cases , 1976 .

[17]  Lawrence A. Tomassini.  Behavioral research on human resource accounting: A contingency framework , 1976 .

[18]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems , 1976 .

[19]  Richard M. Steers.  Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness , 1975 .

[20]  J. Slocum,et al.  Environmental Uncertainty: The Construct and Its Application , 1975 .

[21]  J. Slocum,et al.  Uncertainty: Measures, Research, and Sources of Variation , 1975 .

[22]  Duncan Neuhauser,et al.  The Efficient Organization , 1975 .

[23]  W. Bruns,et al.  BUDGETARY CONTROL AND ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE , 1975 .

[24]  H. G. Heneman,et al.  Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance. , 1974 .

[25]  A. Hopwood,et al.  An accounting system and managerial behaviour , 1973 .

[26]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[27]  R. J. Swieringa,et al.  The Relationship between Managers' Budget-Oriented Behavior and Selected Attitude, Position, Size, and Performance Measures , 1972 .

[28]  A. Hopwood.  An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation , 1972 .

[29]  J. Báumler,et al.  Defined Criteria of Performance in Organizational Control. , 1971 .

[30]  G. Labovitz.  In Defense of Subjective Executive Appraisal , 1969 .

[31]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[32]  D. T. DeCoster,et al.  Budget-Induced Pressure And Its Relationship To Supervisory Behavior , 1968 .

[33]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[34]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[35]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[36]  W. Dill.  Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy , 1958 .

[37]  Joan C. Woodward.  Management and technology , 1958 .