SITE SELECTION BIAS IN PROGRAM EVALUATION Site Selection Bias in Program Evaluation
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Oster | J. Angrist | G. Imbens | J. Ludwig | X. Giné | E. Vytlacil | A. Chandra | Larry Katz | R. Pande | M. Fowlie | Konrad Menzel | Dan Levy | A. Orfei | M. Laitin | Kyle A. Dropp | Piyush Tantia | Christina S. Larkin | D. Yates | H. Williams | N. Srinivas | T. Curtis | Alexander Laskey | J. Hotz | Todd Rogers | C. Knittel | Lucas Davis | Chuck Goldman | Matt Harding | Dan M. Levy
[1] Edward Miguel,et al. Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities, Guide to Replication of Miguel and Kremer (2004) , 2014 .
[2] L. Pritchett,et al. Context Matters for Size: Why External Validity Claims and Development Practice Don't Mix , 2013 .
[3] A. Banerjee,et al. The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation , 2013 .
[4] G. Mwabu,et al. Scaling Up What Works: Experimental Evidence on External Validity in Kenyan Education , 2013 .
[5] Esther Duflo,et al. Do Labor Market Policies Have Displacement Effects? Evidence from a Clustered Randomized Experiment , 2012 .
[6] H. Allcott,et al. The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation , 2012 .
[7] H. Allcott,et al. Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap? , 2012 .
[8] D. Revel. Cost-effectiveness of electricity energy efficiency programs , 2011 .
[9] H. Allcott,et al. Social Norms and Energy Conservation , 2011 .
[10] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Explaining Charter School Effectiveness , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[11] Jeffrey R. Kling,et al. Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations , 2011 .
[12] E. Tamer,et al. Using Observational vs. Randomized Controlled Trial Data to Learn About Treatment Effects , 2011 .
[13] Catherine P. Bradshaw,et al. The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials , 2011, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A,.
[14] J. Angrist,et al. Extrapolate-Ing: External Validity and Overidentification in the Late Framework , 2010 .
[15] Erik Snowberg,et al. Selective Trials: A Principal-Agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments , 2010 .
[16] C. Manski. Policy Analysis with Incredible Certitude , 2010 .
[17] Angus Deaton. Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development , 2010 .
[18] Angus Deaton,et al. Understanding the Mechanisms of Economic Development , 2010 .
[19] Matthew E. Kahn,et al. Energy Conservation "Nudges" and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment , 2010 .
[20] S. Mullainathan,et al. Behavior and Energy Policy , 2010, Science.
[21] Joshua D. Angrist,et al. The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con Out of Econometrics , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[22] Parag A. Pathak,et al. Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston's Charters and Pilots , 2009 .
[23] Dean S. Karlan,et al. Group Versus Individual Liability: Long Term Evidence from Philippine Microcredit Lending Groups , 2009 .
[24] G. Imbens,et al. Better Late than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009) , 2009 .
[25] David Card,et al. Active Labor Market Policy Evaluations: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[26] David Lee,et al. Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics , 2009 .
[27] Sendhil Mullainathan,et al. What's Advertising Content Worth? Evidence from a Consumer Credit Marketing Field Experiment , 2009 .
[28] Dani Rodrik,et al. The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, but How Shall We Learn? , 2008 .
[29] S. Levitt,et al. Nber Working Paper Series Field Experiments in Economics: the Past, the Present, and the Future , 2022 .
[30] Nancy Cartwright,et al. Are RCTs the Gold Standard? , 2007 .
[31] F. Van de Werf,et al. External validity of clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.
[32] Victor Lavy,et al. Multiple Experiments for the Causal Link between the Quantity and Quality of Children , 2006, Journal of Labor Economics.
[33] Dean S. Karlan,et al. Observing Unobservables: Identifying Information Asymmetries with a Consumer Credit Field Experiment , 2005 .
[34] P. Rothwell. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” , 2005, The Lancet.
[35] Esther Duflo,et al. WOMEN AS POLICY MAKERS: EVIDENCE FROM A RANDOMIZED POLICY EXPERIMENT IN INDIA , 2004 .
[36] David H. Greenberg,et al. Digest of Social Experiments , 2004 .
[37] D. Greenberg. Digest of Social Experiments, Third Edition , 2004 .
[38] Esther Duflo,et al. Scaling Up and Evaluation , 2003 .
[39] Joshua D. Angrist,et al. Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Theory and Practice , 2003 .
[40] Rajeev Dehejia,et al. Was There a Riverside Miracle? A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluating Programs With Grouped Data , 2003 .
[41] Lant Pritchett,et al. It pays to be ignorant: A simple political economy of rigorous program evaluation , 2002 .
[42] S. Thompson,et al. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.
[43] E. Duflo,et al. How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .
[44] J. Heckman,et al. Policy-Relevant Treatment Effects , 2001 .
[45] Christopher R. Taber,et al. Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.
[46] James J. Heckman,et al. Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data , 1998 .
[47] Petra E. Todd,et al. Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme , 1997 .
[48] Jeffrey A. Smith,et al. The Sensitivity of Experimental Impact Estimates: Evidence from the National Jtpa Study , 1997 .
[49] James J. Heckman,et al. Assessing the Case for Social Experiments , 1995 .
[50] Thomas Lemieux,et al. Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach , 1995 .
[51] V. Joseph Hotz,et al. Designing Experimental Evaluations of Social Programs: The Case of the U.S. National JTPA Study , 1992 .
[52] Howard S. Bloom,et al. The National JTPA Study: Title II-A Impacts on Earnings and Employment at 18 Months. Executive Summary. , 1992 .
[53] James J. Heckman,et al. Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation , 1991 .
[54] F. Doolittle,et al. Implementing the National JTPA Study. , 1990 .
[55] A. Donabedian,et al. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? , 1988, JAMA.
[56] Kevin M. Murphy,et al. Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models , 1985 .
[57] R. Lalonde. Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data , 1984 .
[58] D. Rubin,et al. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .
[59] D. Campbell. Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.
[60] Dan York,et al. SAVING ENERGY COST-EFFECTIVELY: A NATIONAL REVIEW OF THE COST OF ENERGY SAVED THROUGH UTILITy-SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS , 2014 .
[61] J. Sekhon,et al. From SATE to PATT : Combining Experimental with Observational Studies to Estimate Population Treatment Effects ∗ , 2013 .
[62] Jacob N. Shapiro,et al. Where Policy Experiments are Conducted in Economics and Political Science : The Missing Autocracies ∗ , 2013 .
[63] M. Belot. SIRE-DP-2013-112 Partner Selection into Policy Relevant Field Experiments , 2013 .
[64] Kira Ashby,et al. Green with Envy: Neighbor Comparisons and Social Norms in Five Home Energy Report Programs , 2012 .
[65] I. Ayres,et al. including © notice, is given to the source. Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments that Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage , 2009 .
[66] Pieter A. Gautier,et al. Journal of Applied Econometrics Selection in a Field Experiment with Voluntary Participation , 2009 .
[67] M. Kremer,et al. USING RANDOMIZATION IN DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS RESEARCH: A TOOLKIT , 2008 .
[68] James J. Heckman,et al. Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part I: Causal Models, Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation , 2007 .
[69] James J. Heckman,et al. Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part II: Using the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Econometric Estimators to Evaluate Social Programs, and to Forecast their Effects in New Environments , 2007 .
[70] J. Dinardo,et al. Constructive Proposals for Dealing with Attrition: An Empirical Example∗ , 2006 .
[71] C. Hoxby,et al. The Impact of Charter Schools on Student Achievement , 2005 .
[72] Charu Sharma,et al. Iron deficiency anemia and school participation , 2004 .
[73] Robin Jacob,et al. Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program , 2003 .
[74] C. Gross,et al. Reporting the Recruitment Process in Clinical Trials: Who Are These Patients and How Did They Get There? , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[75] J. Heckman,et al. The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs , 1999 .
[76] Charles F. Manski,et al. Learning about Treatment Effects from Experiments with Random Assignment of Treatments , 1996 .
[77] Bruce D. Meyer. Lessons from the U.S. Unemployment Insurance Experiments , 1995 .
[78] D. de Meza,et al. Health insurance and the demand for medical care. , 1983, Journal of health economics.
[79] J. Heckman. Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .
[80] G. Imbens,et al. Predicting the Efficacy of Future Training Programs Using past Experiences at Other Locations Article in Press , 2022 .
[81] Jacob Alex Klerman,et al. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EVALUATING THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE WELFARE-TO-WORK TRAINING COMPONENTS: A RE-ANALYSIS OF THE CALIFORNIA GAIN PROGRAM , 2022 .