Production of low formaldehyde emission particleboard by using new formulated formaldehyde based resin.

In order to preserve the global market competitiveness, the particleboard industry was affronted with challenges to reduce formaldehyde emission while maintaining the quality strength properties of particleboard. To counter the issue, particleboards with five different surface-to-core ratio were fabricated by applying newly formulated UF and MUF resins which were 30% surface: 70% core (3:7); 40% surface: 60% core (4:6); 50% surface: 50% core (5:5); 60% surface: 40% core (6:4) and 70% surface: 30% core (7:3) based on dry particle weight respectively. Formaldehyde emission and strength properties of the fabricated particleboard were investigated based on Japanese Industrial Standard, which are JIS A 1460 and JIS A 5908, respectively. All the MUF-bonded particleboard complied with the type 18 standard, whereas all the UF-bonded particleboard produced complied with type 13 except thickness swelling of the UF-bonded particleboard. The surface-to-core ratio applied in three layered particleboard for both resins exerted considerable influence on the strength properties and formaldehyde emission of particleboards produced from both resins. MUF-bonded particleboard with 40% surface and 60% core recorded the lowest formaldehyde emission (0.09 mg L-1) and highest strength properties. For UF-bonded particleboard, the ratio of 60% surface and 40% core showed the lowest formaldehyde emission (0.28 mg L-1) with better strength properties. This study highlighted the potential of MUF resin to replace UF resin due to its ability to produce F**** particleboard with better strength properties and lower formaldehyde emission according to JIS A 5908.

[1]  Jegatheswaran Ratnasingam,et al.  The Market Potential of Oil Palm Empty-Fruit Bunches Particleboard as a Furniture Material , 2009 .

[2]  S. Tohmura,et al.  Influence of the melamine content in melamine-urea-formaldehyde resins on formaldehyde emission and cured resin structure , 2001, Journal of Wood Science.

[3]  M. Risholm-Sundman,et al.  Formaldehyde emission—Comparison of different standard methods , 2007 .

[4]  T. Kaljuvee,et al.  TG-DTA study of melamine-urea-formaldehyde resins , 2008 .

[5]  Sumin Kim,et al.  Effect of addition of polyvinyl acetate to melamine-formaldehyde resin on the adhesion and formaldehyde emission in engineered flooring , 2005 .

[6]  M. T. Paridah,et al.  Properties of Particleboard Made from Pretreated Particles of Rubberwood, EFB and Rubberwood-EFB Blend , 2007 .

[7]  A. Pizzi,et al.  PREPARATION AND MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PARTICLEBOARD MADE FROM MARITIME PINE AND GLUED WITH BIO-ADHESIVES BASED ON CORNSTARCH AND TANNINS , 2010 .

[8]  G. Nemli Effects of Some Manufacturing Factors on the Properties of Particleboard Manufactured from Alder (Alnus glutinosa subsp. Barbata) , 2003 .

[9]  Yang Way Loh,et al.  Properties of particleboard produced from admixture of rubberwood and Mahang species , 2010 .

[10]  Gökay Nemli,et al.  Influences of some factors on the formaldehyde content of particleboard , 2006 .

[11]  H. Pan,et al.  Melamine-modified urea formaldehyde resin for bonding particleboards , 2008 .

[12]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Dependance on the adhesive formulation of the upgrading of MUF particleboard adhesives and decrease of melamine content by buffer and additives , 2004, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[13]  Luoping Zhang,et al.  Formaldehyde in China: production, consumption, exposure levels, and health effects. , 2009, Environment international.