A Method for Integrating Multimedia Metadata Standards and Metadata Formats with the Multimedia Metadata Ontology

The M3O abstracts from the existing metadata standards and formats and provides generic modeling solutions for annotations, decompositions, and provenance of metadata. Being a generic modeling framework, the M3O aims at integrating the existing metadata standards and metadata formats rather than replacing them. This is in particular useful as today's multimedia applications often need to combine and use more than one existing metadata standard or metadata format at the same time. However, applying and specializing the abstract and powerful M3O modeling framework in concrete application domains and integrating it with existing metadata formats and metadata standards is not always straightforward. Thus, we have developed a step-by-step alignment method that describes how to integrate existing multimedia metadata standards and metadata formats with the M3O in order to use them in a concrete application. We demonstrate our alignment method by integrating seven different existing metadata standards and metadata formats with the M3O and describe the experiences made during the integration process.

[1]  Peter Stanchev,et al.  MPEG-7: The Multimedia Content Description Interface , 2004 .

[2]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data , 2009, J. Web Semant..

[3]  Stefano Borgo,et al.  Foundational Choices in DOLCE , 2009, Handbook on Ontologies.

[4]  Ansgar Scherp,et al.  Integrating Multimedia Metadata Standarts and Metadata Formats with the Multimedia Metadata Ontology: Method and Examples , 2012 .

[5]  Eero Sormunen,et al.  End-User Searching Challenges Indexing Practices in the Digital Newspaper Photo Archive , 2004, Information Retrieval.

[6]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Ontology Design Patterns , 2005 .

[7]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Classification of user image descriptions , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Understanding the Semantic Web through Descriptions and Situations , 2003, OTM.

[9]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  Patterns of semantic relations to improve image content search , 2007, J. Web Semant..

[10]  Daniel Oberle,et al.  Semantic management of middleware , 2006, DSM '04.

[11]  Susanne Boll,et al.  Multimedia Vocabularies on the Semantic Web , 2007 .

[12]  J. Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching , 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[13]  Eva Blomqvist OntoCase-Automatic Ontology Enrichment Based on Ontology Design Patterns , 2009, International Semantic Web Conference.

[14]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[15]  Wolfgang Klas,et al.  A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability , 2010, CSUR.

[16]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  Enquiring MPEG-7 based multimedia ontologies , 2009, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[17]  Marc Ehrig,et al.  Ontology Alignment: Bridging the Semantic Gap , 2006 .

[18]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Content Ontology Design Patterns as Practical Building Blocks for Web Ontologies , 2008, ER.

[19]  Ansgar Scherp,et al.  Unlocking the semantics of multimedia presentations in the web with the multimedia metadata ontology , 2010, WWW '10.

[20]  Steffen Staab,et al.  COMM: Designing a Well-Founded Multimedia Ontology for the Web , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[21]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[22]  Lynda Hardman,et al.  Canonical processes of semantically annotated media production , 2008, Multimedia Systems.