Mars EXPRESS observation of the PHOENIX entry: simulations, planning, results and lessons learned

NASA’s PHOENIX spacecraft has successfully landed on Mars on 25 May 2008. ESA supported the event by recording signals from PHOENIX by the Mars EXPRESS spacecraft using its lander communication subsystem. Following numerical simulations of the probe entry plume emission, two Mars EXPRESS instruments, namely the High Resolution and Stereo Camera (HRSC) and the Ultraviolet and Infrared Spectrometer (SPICAM), were switched on in to observe the emission associated with the atmospheric entry. No positive detection was reported unfortunately. This article reports on the simulations, the planning, and the results. The non-detection by the UV spectrometer was due to a wrong instrument setting. Result for the camera is tentatively explained by the level of emission in the visible range. Lessons learned are given in the conclusions: the entry probe trajectory should be communicated as soon as possible to all interested parties, within the boundary conditions of confidentiality obviously. It is important to plan some redundancy to prevent incorrect instrument operations. A multi-instrument multi-spacecraft campaign should be encouraged by all means. Since detection of such faint signal is challenging, the integration time must be properly matched to the event duration. Payload operational (exclusion) rules should be discussed in an open way, to check whether the prudence of such measures is procedural or physical. The numerical simulations discussed in this paper have been focused on IR radiation in the lower density flow wake, using a DSMC/line-by-line method. These could be complemented with other numerical approaches more focused in the VUV–visible region in the high-pressure bow-shock region, using continuum Navier–Stokes fluid methods, which would yield information on the contribution to the emission spectrum from minor flow species such as CN, C2 and C.

[1]  R. Anderson,et al.  Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation , 2012 .

[2]  Donn B. Kirk,et al.  Aerodynamic Behavior of the Viking Entry Vehicle: Ground Test and Flight Results , 1978 .

[3]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  Huygens entry emission: Observation campaign, results, and lessons learned , 2006 .

[4]  R. Braun,et al.  Mars Pathfinder atmospheric entry - Trajectory design and dispersion analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Stephen R. Lewis,et al.  A climate database for Mars , 1999 .

[6]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  Overview of the coordinated ground-based observations of Titan during the Huygens mission , 2006 .

[7]  S. C. Sommer,et al.  Probing a planetary atmosphere - Pioneer Venus spacecraft description , 1975 .

[8]  P. D. Silva,et al.  Simulation des propriétés radiatives du plasma entourant un véhicule traversant une atmosphère planétaire à vitesse hypersonique : application à la Planète Mars , 2004 .

[9]  Prasun N. Desai,et al.  Entry, descent, and landing scenario for the mars exploration rover mission , 2007 .

[10]  Stephen R. Lewis,et al.  Mars Climate Database version 5 , 2012 .

[12]  Graeme A. Bird,et al.  The DS2V/3V Program Suite for DSMC Calculations , 2005 .

[13]  O. Witasse,et al.  Radiative Trail of the PHOENIX Entry , 2009 .

[14]  C. Sobeck,et al.  Galileo Probe: In Situ Observations of Jupiter's Atmosphere , 1996, Science.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Lebreton,et al.  An overview of the descent and landing of the Huygens probe on Titan , 2005, Nature.

[16]  P. Jenniskens,et al.  Airborne imaging and NIR spectroscopy of the ESA ATV spacecraft re-entry: instrument design and preliminary data description , 2011 .

[17]  Douglas O. ReVelle,et al.  Stardust—An artificial, low‐velocity “meteor” fall and recovery: 15 January 2006 , 2007 .

[18]  M. D. Silva An adaptive line-by-line—statistical model for fast and accurate spectral simulations in low-pressure plasmas , 2007 .

[19]  Mark D. Garcia,et al.  Mission design of the Phoenix Mars Scout mission , 2008 .