Validation of Milliflex® Quantum for Bioburden Testing of Pharmaceutical Products

This article reports the validation strategy used to demonstrate that the Milliflex® Quantum yielded non-inferior results to the traditional bioburden method. It was validated according to USP <1223>, European Pharmacopoeia 5.1.6, and Parenteral Drug Association Technical Report No. 33 and comprised the validation parameters robustness, ruggedness, repeatability, specificity, limit of detection and quantification, accuracy, precision, linearity, range, and equivalence in routine operation. For the validation, a combination of pharmacopeial ATCC strains as well as a broad selection of in-house isolates were used. In-house isolates were used in stressed state. Results were statistically evaluated regarding the pharmacopeial acceptance criterion of ≥70% recovery compared to the traditional method. Post-hoc test power calculations verified the appropriateness of the used sample size to detect such a difference. Furthermore, equivalence tests verified non-inferiority of the rapid method as compared to the traditional method. In conclusion, the rapid bioburden on basis of the Milliflex® Quantum was successfully validated as alternative method to the traditional bioburden test. LAY ABSTRACT: Pharmaceutical drug products must fulfill specified quality criteria regarding their microbial content in order to ensure patient safety. Drugs that are delivered into the body via injection, infusion, or implantation must be sterile (i.e., devoid of living microorganisms). Bioburden testing measures the levels of microbes present in the bulk solution of a drug before sterilization, and thus it provides important information for manufacturing a safe product. In general, bioburden testing has to be performed using the methods described in the pharmacopoeias (membrane filtration or plate count). These methods are well established and validated regarding their effectiveness; however, the incubation time required to visually identify microbial colonies is long. Thus, alternative methods that detect microbial contamination faster will improve control over the manufacturing process and speed up product release. Before alternative methods may be used, they must undergo a side-by-side comparison with pharmacopeial methods. In this comparison, referred to as validation, it must be shown in a statistically verified manner that the effectiveness of the alternative method is at least equivalent to that of the pharmacopeial methods. Here we describe the successful validation of an alternative bioburden testing method based on fluorescent staining of growing microorganisms applying the Milliflex® Quantum system by MilliporeSigma.

[1]  Michael J. Miller,et al.  Rapid methods update: revisions to a United States Pharmacopeia chapter , 2015 .

[2]  Kanami Irie,et al.  Investigation of the Detection Ability of an Intrinsic Fluorescence-Based Bioaerosol Detection System for Heat-Stressed Bacteria , 2014, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[3]  H. Anders,et al.  Overview of rapid microbiological methods evaluated, validated and implemented for , 2011 .

[4]  R. Spíšek,et al.  Assessment of lymphocyte proliferation: CFSE kills dividing cells and modulates expression of activation markers. , 2009, Cellular immunology.

[5]  Praful K Bhusari,et al.  Application of Flow Cytometry for Rapid Bioburden Screening in Vaccine Virus Production , 2012, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[6]  Tim Sandle,et al.  Approaching the Selection of Rapid Microbiological Methods , 2018 .

[7]  Yan Tan,et al.  Carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester fluorescent dye for cell labeling. , 2005, Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica.

[8]  S. Flint,et al.  Description and validation of a rapid (1 h) flow cytometry test for enumerating thermophilic bacteria in milk powders , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[9]  J. Maillard,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation into the Ability of Three Rapid Microbiological Methods To Detect Microorganisms in Hospital Intravenous Pharmaceuticals , 2013, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[10]  S. Farajnia,et al.  DETERMINATION OF INDICATOR BACTERIA IN PHARMACEUTICAL SAMPLES BY MULTIPLEX PCR , 2009 .

[11]  S. Jouette 5.1.6. ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR CONTROL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY , 2007 .

[12]  A. Thiel,et al.  Staining of Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies: a suitable method for identifying infected human monocytes by flow cytometry. , 2007, Journal of microbiological methods.

[13]  Roanna London,et al.  An Automated System for Rapid Non-Destructive Enumeration of Growing Microbes , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  G. Rao,et al.  Fluorescence-Based Method and a Device for Rapid Detection of Microbial Contamination , 2014, PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology.

[15]  G. Neuhaus,et al.  Growth-promoting Properties of Different Solid Nutrient Media Evaluated with Stressed and Unstressed Micro-organisms: Prestudy for the Validation of a Rapid Sterility Test. , 2010, PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology.

[16]  S. Jalal,et al.  Molecular detection and identification of Candida and Aspergillus spp. from clinical samples using real-time PCR. , 2006, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.