Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently.

Infrequent "deviant' auditory stimuli embedded in a homogeneous sequence of "standard' sounds evoke a neuromagnetic mismatch field (MMF), which is assumed to reflect automatic change detection in the brain. We investigated whether MMFs would reveal hemispheric differences in cortical auditory processing. Seven healthy adults were studied with a whole-scalp neuromagnetometer. The sound sequence, delivered to one ear at time, contained three infrequent deviants (differing from standards in duration, frequency, or interstimulus interval) intermixed with standard tones. MMFs peaked 9-34 msec earlier in the right than in the left hemisphere, irrespective of the stimulated ear. Whereas deviants activated only one MMF source in the left hemisphere, two temporally overlapping but spatially separate sources, one in the temporal lobe and another in the inferior parietal cortex, were necessary to explain the right-hemisphere MMFs. We suggest that the bilateral MMF components originating in the supratemporal cortex are feature specific whereas the right-hemisphere parietal component reflects more global auditory change detection. The results imply hemispheric differences in sound processing and suggest stronger involvement of the right than the left hemisphere in change detection.

[1]  R Näätänen,et al.  Can echoic memory store two traces simultaneously? A study of event-related brain potentials. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[2]  M. Reite,et al.  Magnetic auditory evoked fields: interhemispheric asymmetry. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  Cortical responses to changes in auditory stimuli. Magnetoencephalographic studies. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[4]  L. Parkkonen,et al.  122-channel squid instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain , 1993 .

[5]  M Hoke,et al.  Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: localization of the mismatch field. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: Neuromagnetic recordings in man , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  R. Zatorre.  Discrimination and recognition of tonal melodies after unilateral cerebral excisions , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  R. Näätänen.  The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  T. Carrell,et al.  Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Hari.  The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex , 1990 .

[11]  E. Schröger,et al.  Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[12]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  M Hallett,et al.  Intra- and interhemispheric connections of the neocortical auditory system in the rhesus monkey. , 1969, Brain research.

[15]  J. Mäkelä,et al.  Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole‐head neuromagnetic recordings , 1993 .

[16]  F. Perrin,et al.  Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[17]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Event-related potentials (ERPs) to interruptions of a steady rhythm. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[18]  M. Kajola,et al.  Generator sites of spontaneous MEG activity during sleep. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[20]  K. Lehnertz,et al.  Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural tone burst stimulation. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  R. Hari,et al.  Separate finger representations at the human second somatosensory cortex , 1990, Neuroscience.

[22]  O. Salonen,et al.  Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields to Tones and Pseudowords in Healthy Children and Adults , 1995, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[23]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[24]  R. Näätänen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[25]  Human auditory cortex responses to rising versus falling glides , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  K M Heilman,et al.  Disorders of visual attention. , 1993, Bailliere's clinical neurology.

[27]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to short frequency glides , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  J Pernier,et al.  Scalp topographies dissociate attentional ERP components during auditory information processing. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[29]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Role of the right temporal neocortex in retention of pitch in auditory short-term memory. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  K. Alho,et al.  Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  T. Carrell,et al.  Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  P E Roland,et al.  Focal activations of human cerebral cortex during auditory discrimination. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Polysensory “Association” Areas of the Cerebral Cortex , 1982 .

[35]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses of human auditory cortex to interruptions in a steady rhythm , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[36]  L Leinonen,et al.  Cerebral magnetic responses to stimulation of ulnar and median nerves. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing. , 1992, Science.

[38]  F. Perrin,et al.  Separate Representation of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Duration in Auditory Sensory Memory: An Event-Related Potential and Dipole-Model Analysis , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Representation of abstract attributes of auditory stimuli in the human brain. , 1992, Neuroreport.

[40]  R Hari,et al.  Neuromagnetic mismatch fields to single and paired tones. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  K. Heilman,et al.  Evoked potential in neglect. , 1977, Archives of neurology.

[42]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  R. Hari,et al.  Cerebral neuromagnetic responses evoked by short auditory stimuli. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  M. Kajola,et al.  Interaural interaction in the human auditory cortex. , 1989, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[45]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Event-Related Potentials to Infrequent Changes in Synthesized Phonetic Stimuli , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  R Näätänen,et al.  Phonetic invariance in the human auditory cortex. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[48]  Sources of auditory evoked fields superiposed on 3D-MRI reconstruction of temporal lobes , 1993 .