Does "callosal relay" explain ear advantage in dichotic monitoring?

Pairs of consonant-vowel (CV) syllables were dichotically presented to a large sample of healthy subjects (n = 263) who were instructed to monitor for the presence of a target CV (/ta/) which could occur in either ear. The subjects responded by pressing a response button, allowing the recording of reaction times (RTs) and number of correct responses. The investigated sample comprised consistent right-handers (CRH), consistent left-handers (CLH), and mixed-handers (MH). It was found that right-ear targets were detected more frequently and faster than left-ear targets, both in CRH and MH subjects. CLH subjects, on the other hand, responded faster to targets presented to the left ear but there was no ear advantage in terms of the correct responses. The RT data were used to examine whether they are compatible with the callosal relay model of language lateralisation. It was found that the predictions made by the callosal relay model were supported by the RT data for all groups.

[1]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum , 1992, Brain Research.

[2]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Dichotic Listening in Man after Section of Neocortical Commissures , 1968 .

[3]  K. Amunts,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of the human motor cortex related to handedness and gender , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  D. Kimura.  Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. , 1961 .

[5]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer time and corpus callosum size. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[6]  A. Lundervold,et al.  Dichotic-listening performance and intracarotid injections of amobarbital in children and adolescents. Preoperative and postoperative comparisons. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[7]  M. Annett.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[8]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Tapping movements according to regular and irregular visual timing signals investigated with fMRI , 2000, Neuroreport.

[9]  S. P. Springer.  Ear asymmetry in a dichotic detection task , 1971 .

[10]  M. Bryden.  An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. , 1988 .

[11]  J. Volkmann,et al.  Dichotic listening: What does it measure? , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Bimodal (auditory and visual) left frontoparietal circuitry for sensorimotor integration and sensorimotor learning. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Human attention: the exclusion of distracting information as a function of real and apparent separation of relevant and irrelevant events , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Cerebellar Contributions to Motor Timing: A PET Study of Auditory and Visual Rhythm Reproduction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  A Belger,et al.  Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[16]  M. Banich,et al.  The sum of the parts does not equal the whole: evidence from bihemispheric processing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  B Milner,et al.  Lateralized Suppression of Dichotically Presented Digits after Commissural Section in Man , 1968, Science.

[18]  D KIMURA,et al.  Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. , 1961, Canadian journal of psychology.

[19]  Gina Geffen,et al.  Reliability and validity of the dichotic monitoring test for language laterality , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  M. Corballis,et al.  The right shift theory of a genetic balanced polymorphism for cerebral dominance and cognitive processing. Commentaries. Author's reply , 1995 .