Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer

The coordination dynamics of learning and transfer were studied in a single limb multijoint task requiring rhythmic elbow and wrist motions. Participants were required to learn a continuous 90° relative phase pattern between the elbow and wrist such that an angle-angle plot of elbow and wrist motion produced a circle with a diameter of 80°. Joint motion was restricted to elbow and wrist flexion-extension on the sagittal plane and the to-be-learned 90° relative phase pattern was always practiced with the learning arm supine. Cycling frequency was controlled by a pacing metronome set at 0.75 Hz. Issues regarding effector-independent and effector-specific transfer were addressed with three transfer conditions: (1) learning arm prone (LP), (2) non-learning arm supine (NS), and (3) non-learning arm prone (NP). Four subjects learned the required relative phase (90°) and amplitude (80°) pattern with their dominant arm and four with their non-dominant arm. The experiment produced three main findings with regard to elbow-wrist control processes: First, seven of eight participants spontaneously produced a wrist-lagging coordination pattern (wrist motion lagged elbow motion) in learning to produce a continuous relative phase pattern of 90° between the elbow and wrist. The wrist-lagging pattern may emerge as a result of the central nervous system exploiting the transfer of angular momentum from the elbow to the wrist as the elbow rotates up and down. The influence of interactive torque on elbow-wrist coordination represents an important mechanical constraint on the selection of intralimb coordination strategies during learning. The transfer conditions revealed that this mechanical constraint was effector-independent with regard to ipsilateral limb transfer (LP) and contralateral limb transfer (NS and NP). Second, consistent transfer of the learned relative phase pattern across ipsilateral and contralateral conditions demonstrates an effector-independent representation for this control variable. The effector-independent and effector-specific nature of joint amplitude transfer was dependent to some degree on learning arm, dominant or non-dominant, and the amount of practice, 1 day versus 5 days. Third, learning of the required 90° relative phase pattern may be characterized as a phase transition leading to the formation of a stable attractor in the elbow-wrist coordination landscape. The above findings are discussed with respect to motor programming and coordination dynamic viewpoints on effector-independent and effector-specific aspects of motor equivalence.

[1]  Pier-Giorgio Zanone,et al.  Experimental Studies of Behavioral Attractors and Their Evolution with Learning , 1991 .

[2]  J. Kelso,et al.  A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Valentino Bettinardi,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries and bimanual asynchrony in left- and right-handers , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  R. Sainburg,et al.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  S. Small,et al.  Lateralization of motor circuits and handedness during finger movements , 2001, European journal of neurology.

[6]  G. E. Stelmach,et al.  Commonalities and differences in control of various drawing movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  S. P. Swinnen,et al.  Relative Phase Alterations During Bimanual Skill Acquisition. , 1995, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  H. Haken,et al.  A stochastic theory of phase transitions in human hand movement , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[10]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  1 On the Concept of Coordinative Structures as Dissipative Structures: I. Theoretical Lines of Convergence* , 1980 .

[11]  C. Shea,et al.  Effector Independence , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  M T Turvey,et al.  Dynamical aspects of learning an interlimb rhythmic movement pattern. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Kots IaM,et al.  [Fixed set of variants of the interaction of 2 junction muscles, used while accomplishing simple random movements]. , 1966 .

[14]  P. Beek,et al.  Learning the cascade juggle: a dynamical systems analysis. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  M. Turvey,et al.  Diffusive, Synaptic, and Synergetic Coupling: An Evaluation Through In-Phase and Antiphase Rhythmic Movements. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  P G Zanone,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  T D Lee,et al.  Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns. , 1997, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Asymmetry in the Human Motor Cortex and Handedness , 1996, NeuroImage.

[20]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  J. Kelso,et al.  Posturally induced transitions in rhythmic multijoint limb movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  J. Kelso,et al.  Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  S. P. Swinnen,et al.  Hierarchical control of different elbow-wrist coordination patterns , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  G. Schöner,et al.  Learning and recall in a dynamic theory of coordination patterns , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Kelso,et al.  Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: collective and component levels. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Ym. Kots Fixed set of variants of interaction of the muscles of two joints used in the execution of simple voluntary movements , 1966 .

[30]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Effect of Practice on Effector Independence , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[31]  J. Kelso,et al.  A quantitative approach to understanding the formation and change of coordinated movement patterns. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[32]  J. Lieberman,et al.  Cerebellar volume asymmetries are related to handedness: A quantitative MRI study , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  C Ghez,et al.  Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[34]  J. Kelso,et al.  A synergetic theory of environmentally-specified and learned patterns of movement coordination , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[35]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[36]  T. Torioka,et al.  Formation of segregated regions of feature detecting cells in self-organizing nerve field , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[37]  J. Kelso,et al.  Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. , 1992 .

[38]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Resonance Constraints on Rhythmic Movement , 1993 .

[39]  Polemnia G. Amazeen,et al.  Is Dynamics the Content of a Generalized Motor Program for Rhythmic Interlimb Coordination? , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[40]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.