University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy

Technology transfer offices (TTOs) are of strategic importance to universities committed to the commercialization of academic knowledge. Within the university, TTOs' relationship with academics and management is single agent-multiple principal. When two principals exist in an agency relationship, conflicting expectations can naturally arise. We explore how TTOs build legitimacy by shaping identity with university academics and management. In undertaking this research we draw on 63 interviews with TTO executives across 22 universities in the Ireland, New Zealand and the United States. We find that TTOs use identity-conformance and identity-manipulation to shape a dual identity, one scientific and the other business, with academics and management respectively. We show how this combination of identity strategies is ineffective for legitimizing the TTO. We propose that TTOs' identity shaping strategies are incomplete and need to incorporate a wholly distinctive identity to complement and reinforce preliminary legitimacy claims made through conformance and manipulation. We discuss the potential implications of these findings for scholars, TTO executives and university management.

[1]  Mike Wright,et al.  Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence , 2005 .

[2]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Resource Cooptation Via Social Contracting: Resource Acquisition Strategies for New Ventures , 1990 .

[3]  Joshua B. Powers,et al.  University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[4]  Fiona E. Murray,et al.  Does Patent Strategy Shape the Long-Run Supply of Public Knowledge? Evidence from Human Genetics , 2009 .

[5]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames , 2007 .

[6]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[7]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1 , 2006, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[9]  Candace Jones,et al.  Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005 , 2010 .

[10]  R. Merton.  Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[11]  Thomas O'Donoghue,et al.  Qualitative educational research in action : doing and reflecting , 2003 .

[12]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project , 2011 .

[13]  L. Zucker.  Institutional patterns and organizations : culture and environment , 1989 .

[14]  Matthew S. Kraatz,et al.  Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism , 2008 .

[15]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[16]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings , 1996 .

[17]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[18]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Exploring the emerging knowledge base of ‘the knowledge society’ , 2012 .

[19]  Diana Nadine Boehm,et al.  ‘A jack of all trades’: the role of PIs in the establishment and management of collaborative networks in scientific knowledge commercialisation , 2014 .

[20]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[22]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[23]  A. Geuna,et al.  The Governance of University-Industry Knowledge Transfer:Why small firms do (not) develop institutional collaborations? , 2010 .

[24]  David L. Deephouse.  To Be Different or to Be the Same? It's a Question (and a Theory) of Strategic Balance , 1998 .

[25]  M. Wright,et al.  Research and Technology Commercialization , 2008 .

[26]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down Policies Towards the Commercialization of University Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[28]  Alex Bitektine.  Toward a Theory of Social Judgments of Organizations: The Case of Legitimacy, Reputation, and Status , 2011 .

[29]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Emotional Labor in Service Roles: The Influence of Identity , 1993 .

[30]  Peter Burke,et al.  The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. , 1980 .

[31]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward , 2006 .

[32]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[33]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[35]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[36]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy Discount , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[38]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market , 2005 .

[39]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  From Vulnerable to Venerated: The Institutionalization of Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences , 2007 .

[40]  M. Glynn,et al.  How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990–2005 , 2010 .

[41]  Peter T. Gianiodis,et al.  Supply-Side Innovation and Technology Commercialization , 2009 .

[42]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[43]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Assessing creativity in hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments , 2003 .

[44]  Ammon Salter,et al.  In Good Company: The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists , 2014 .

[45]  R. Marshall,et al.  Social legitimacy versus distinctiveness: Mapping the place of consumers in the mental representations of managers in an institutionalized environment , 2013 .

[46]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[47]  Irwin Feller.  University Patent and Technology-Licensing Strategies , 1990 .

[48]  Gerard George,et al.  Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity , 2009 .

[49]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[50]  M. Pratt,et al.  Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities , 2000 .

[51]  P. Burke,et al.  The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory* , 2000 .

[52]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer , 2009 .

[53]  Sanjay K. Jain,et al.  Technology Transfer Offices as Institutional Entrepreneurs: The Case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007 .

[54]  H. Etzkowitz.  Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[55]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[56]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[57]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities' Patenting Activities Between 1965 and 2002 , 2006 .

[58]  Mike Wright,et al.  Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom , 2010 .

[59]  Albert N. Link,et al.  University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence , 2005 .

[60]  M. Lounsbury.  Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy and the Acquisition of Resources , 2001 .

[61]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Universities and the global knowledge economy , 1997 .

[62]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Identity Work and Legitimacy , 2013 .

[63]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  New Academic Fields as Admittance-Seeking Social Movements: The Case of Strategic Management , 2008 .

[64]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts , 2006 .

[65]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[66]  Jeongsik Lee,et al.  The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative , 2014 .

[67]  T. Allen,et al.  Delineating the Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial University: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Experience , 2007 .

[68]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[69]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[70]  S. Sörlin.  Funding Diversity: Performance-based Funding Regimes as Drivers of Differentiation in Higher Education Systems , 2007 .

[71]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Roads to Institutionalization , 2006 .

[72]  M. Wright,et al.  The Influence of University Departments on the Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies in Spin-Off Ventures , 2014 .

[73]  Andrew Ward,et al.  Embeddedness, Social Identity and Mobility: Why Firms Leave the NASDAQ and Join the New York Stock Exchange , 2000 .

[74]  Mike Wright,et al.  Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .

[75]  E. Eisenberg.  Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication , 1984 .

[76]  Robert B. Lount,et al.  Mitigating Principal-Agent Problems in Base-of-the-Pyramid Markets: An Identity Spillover Perspective , 2013 .

[77]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials , 2000 .

[78]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[79]  Mary Ann Glynn,et al.  Pluralism and the Problem of Variety , 2000 .

[80]  Shelley L. Brickson.  Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders , 2005 .

[81]  V. Bush.  Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[82]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy , 2002 .

[83]  J. Porac,et al.  Sociocognitive Dynamics in a Product Market , 1999 .

[84]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[85]  T. Reay,et al.  Florence Nightingale Endures: Legitimizing a New Professional Role Identity , 2010 .

[86]  J. George,et al.  The Paradox of Dueling Identities: The Case of Local Senior Executives in MNC Subsidiaries , 2006 .

[87]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  That's Our Turf! Identity Domains and Competitive Dynamics , 2010 .

[88]  P. Caines,et al.  Society, research policy and systems science , 1977, 1977 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 16th Symposium on Adaptive Processes and A Special Symposium on Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications.

[89]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany , 2011 .

[90]  E. Ferlie,et al.  The Nonspread of Innovations: the Mediating Role of Professionals , 2005 .

[91]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability , 2000 .

[92]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[93]  Devrim Göktepe-Hultén,et al.  Academic inventors and research groups: entrepreneurial cultures at universities , 2008 .

[94]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[95]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. , 1992 .

[96]  M. Billingsley.  The Process Study , 1986, The Nurse practitioner.

[97]  M. Wright,et al.  Transnational Entrepreneurship: An Emergent Field of Study , 2009 .

[98]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[99]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[100]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Roads to Institutionalization: The Remaking of Boundaries between Public and Private Science , 2006 .

[101]  David Bennett,et al.  University to business technology transfer—UK and USA comparisons , 2007 .

[102]  H. Etzkowitz.  Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[103]  R. Nelson.  The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[104]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy , 2005 .

[105]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Which Hat to Wear? The Relative Salience of Multiple Identities in Organizational Contexts , 2014 .

[106]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy , 2010 .

[107]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions , 2008 .

[108]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[109]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational Identity , 2006 .

[110]  Chad Navis,et al.  Categories, Identities, and Cultural Classification: Moving Beyond a Model of Categorical Constraint , 2013 .

[111]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation , 1990 .

[112]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[113]  B. Hillebrand,et al.  Explaining Stability and Change: The Rise and Fall of Logics in Pluralistic Fields , 2011 .

[114]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act and scientist entrepreneurship , 2011 .

[115]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[116]  Johanna L. Francis,et al.  Fortune Favours the Prepared Region: The Case of Entrepreneurship and the Capitol Region Biotechnology Cluster , 2003 .

[117]  S. Albert,et al.  The hybrid identity of law firms , 2002 .

[118]  Steven M. Chermak,et al.  Maintaining legitimacy using external communication strategies: An analysis of police-media relations , 2005 .

[119]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites , 2009 .

[120]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Institutionalization of university-industry interaction: an empirical study of the impact of formal structures on collaboration patterns , 2011 .

[121]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[122]  Iaira Boissevain,et al.  [Keeping an eye on it...]. , 2010, Tijdschrift voor diergeneeskunde.

[123]  M. Pratt.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ambivalent: Managing Identification among Amway Distributors , 2000 .

[124]  T. Kostova,et al.  A model of dual organizational identification in the context of the multinational enterprise , 2007 .

[125]  Alice Lam,et al.  From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries , 2009 .

[126]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[127]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  The Charismatic Relationship: A Dramaturgical Perspective , 1998 .

[128]  E. B. Smith.  Identities as Lenses: How Organizational Identity Affects Audiences' Evaluation of Organizational Performance , 2010 .

[129]  Anat Rafaeli,et al.  Organizational Dress as a Symbol of Multilayered Social Identities , 1997 .

[130]  Glen E. Kreiner,et al.  BALANCING BORDERS AND BRIDGES: NEGOTIATING THE WORK-HOME INTERFACE VIA BOUNDARY WORK TACTICS , 2009 .

[131]  Elizabeth George,et al.  One Foot in Each Camp: The Dual Identification of Contract Workers , 2005 .

[132]  Fiona E. Murray.  The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[133]  Vincent Mangematin,et al.  PIs as boundary spanners, science and market shapers , 2014 .

[134]  B. Clarysse,et al.  A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off , 2004 .

[135]  Jeannette A. Colyvas.  From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University , 2007 .

[136]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[137]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[138]  Quy Nguyen Huy,et al.  How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources , 2007 .

[139]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[140]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[141]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[142]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Competitive Positioning Withing and Across a Strategic Group Structure: The Performance of Core, Secondary, and Solitary Firms , 2002 .

[143]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks , 2002 .

[144]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[145]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[146]  Jeannette A. Colyvas,et al.  Ubiquity and Legitimacy: Disentangling Diffusion and Institutionalization* , 2011 .

[147]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[148]  Dirk Czarnitzki,et al.  Commercializing Science: Is There a University "Brain Drain" from Academic Entrepreneurship? , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[149]  A. Salter,et al.  Crossing the Rubicon: Exploring the Factors that Shape Academics Perceptions of the Barriers to Working with Industry , 2012 .

[150]  Mary Ann Glynn,et al.  Legitimate Distinctiveness and The Entrepreneurial Identity: Influence on Investor Judgments of New Venture Plausibility , 2011 .

[151]  James Austin.  Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts: by Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1979. , 1982 .

[152]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions , 2008 .

[153]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[154]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Are universities and university research under threat? Towards an evolutionary model of university speciation , 2012 .

[155]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[156]  Federica Rossi,et al.  Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions , 2013 .

[157]  M. Perkmann,et al.  Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .