The SUNDISC cycle: A direct storage-charging dual-pressure air receiver cycle

Abstract A novel concentrating solar power cycle, the SUNDISC cycle, is proposed to address identified shortcomings of asynchronous combined cycles with a solarized gas turbine. The bottleneck in these cycles is the gas turbine because the mass flow through the pressurized air receiver system and, therefore, the amount of thermal energy that can be used in the bottoming cycle, is limited to the maximum throughput of the turbine. The enhancement in the SUNDISC cycle is an additional low-pressure air receiver system that is uncoupled from the gas turbine and directly feeds the storage system or steam generator. Different variations of the cycle with separated and hybrid receiver systems are presented and selected operating modes are shown. The asynchronous power cycles and separated receiver systems allow for project-specific plant layout and operation. Annual simulations with an hourly thermodynamic model returned the lowest levelized cost for a plant generating electricity during 87% of the year practically without co-firing. During almost all of this time, one of the two cycles operates at full load. The large storage capacity needed for this baseload plant is viable because of the low anticipated cost of the rock bed thermal energy storage technology. The calculated levelized cost of this plant is 25% lower than for a plant without a low-pressure receiver and is predicted to be on a par with a next-generation molten salt plant’s cost once medium-scale roll-out has commenced.

[1]  Steve Schell,et al.  Design and evaluation of esolar's heliostat fields , 2011 .

[2]  Manuel Romero,et al.  Analysis of air return alternatives for CRS-type open volumetric reciever , 2004 .

[3]  K. W. Li,et al.  Power Plant System Design , 1985 .

[4]  Paul Gauché,et al.  Dual-pressure Air Receiver Cycle for Direct Storage Charging☆ , 2014 .

[5]  F. Curzon,et al.  Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output , 1975 .

[7]  L. Heller Development of a dual-pressure air receiver system for the SUNDISC cycle , 2017 .

[8]  D. Waples,et al.  A Review and Evaluation of Specific Heat Capacities of Rocks, Minerals, and Subsurface Fluids. Part 2: Fluids and Porous Rocks , 2004 .

[9]  Miriam Ebert,et al.  Solugas – Operation Experience of the First Solar Hybrid Gas Turbine System at MW Scale , 2014 .

[10]  Antonio L. Avila-Marin,et al.  Volumetric receivers in Solar Thermal Power Plants with Central Receiver System technology: A review , 2011 .

[11]  D. G. Kröger,et al.  Rock bed pressure drop and heat transfer: Simple design correlations , 2015 .

[12]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  Power Tower Technology Roadmap and Cost Reduction Plan , 2011 .

[13]  K. Allen,et al.  Rock bed thermal storage for concentrating solar power plants , 2014 .

[14]  Paul Gauché,et al.  Modeling of the rock bed thermal energy storage system of a combined cycle solar thermal power plant in South Africa , 2013 .

[15]  Peter Schwarzbözl,et al.  Solar-Hybrid Gas Turbine-based Power Tower Systems (REFOS)* , 2001 .

[16]  T. S. Kim,et al.  Comparative analysis on the part load performance of combined cycle plants considering design performance and power control strategy , 2004 .

[17]  Abraham Kribus,et al.  A solar-driven combined cycle power plant , 1998 .

[18]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of a solar tower system with open volumetic receiver - a review on the vICERP project , 2011 .

[19]  Jeffrey M. Gordon,et al.  Optimization of gas-turbine combined cycles for solar energy and alternative-fuel power generation , 1992 .

[20]  Abraham Kribus,et al.  A Multistage Solar Receiver , 1999 .

[21]  Meherwan P. Boyce,et al.  Gas turbine engineering handbook , 1981 .

[22]  A. Brent,et al.  Developing a competitive concentrating solar power industry in South Africa: Current gaps and recommended next steps , 2014 .

[23]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  An evaluation of possible next-generation high temperature molten-salt power towers. , 2011 .

[24]  D. G. Kröger,et al.  Rock bed storage for solar thermal power plants: Rock characteristics, suitability, and availability , 2014 .

[25]  Bjarne Andresen,et al.  On the Curzon–Ahlborn efficiency and its connection with the efficiencies of real heat engines , 2001 .

[26]  Jaap Hoffmann,et al.  A cost and performance evaluation of SUNDISC: a dual-pressure air receiver cycle , 2015 .

[27]  Brian D. Iverson,et al.  Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power , 2014 .

[28]  Bernhard Hoffschmidt,et al.  TEST RESULTS OF A 3 MW SOLAR OPEN VOLUMETRIC RECEIVER , 2003 .